DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi,
i installed apt-proxy, created a new partition and mounted it under /var/cache/apt-proxy with "defaults". I then did "apt-get update" and installed some things (on the server). I configured the client PC, tried to do "apt-get update" and stuck waiting for the headers. When i went back to the apt-proxy server, i found no directory structure -in fact nothing!- under /var/cache/apt-proxy. Ideas?
apt-cacher is a good/working alternative -i think- to apt-proxy. If a packet doesn't exist in the server, i think, that it is downloaded independently by the clients. This is not good, but i am not also sure if it happens. Can somebody confirm? If this happens, would it be possible to change it and make the server cache all packages instead?
apt-cacher is a good/working alternative -i think- to apt-proxy. If a packet doesn't exist in the server, i think, that it is downloaded independently by the clients. This is not good, but i am not also sure if it happens. Can somebody confirm? If this happens, would it be possible to change it and make the server cache all packages instead?
Today, i found out it isn't downloaded independently by the client -fortunately...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.