Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
12-05-2004, 04:33 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Distribution: Mepis, Libranet, Vector, Slackware
Posts: 42
Rep:
|
AfterStep 2.0
Anyone have any experience with AfterStep 2.0? How do you use it? I mean how do you change the menu settings, add to the menu, change the icon actions and add icons to the desktop?
I am currently using WindowMaker .92 (love it!) but I want to see if I can use Afterstep on my laptop. It seems very light.
|
|
|
12-05-2004, 05:08 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
Posts: 1,597
Rep:
|
AfterStep 2.0 offers lots of eye candy -- animations etc. I bet it looks even better with Xorg. But the configuration is a usability nightmare, IMO. All configuration is done by editing config files, just like in FVWM. Not very intuitive.
I haven't been able to find a good guide on tweaking these config files. The project's web site offers some kind of "visual documentation" and that is probably going the best (and possibly the only) guide you'll get.
Window Maker is much more intuitive. You can drag appicons with mouse to dock them. And there's a GUI config app. You hardly ever need to edit config files. But I'd like to see in Window Maker a similar pager that FVWM and AfterStep have.
|
|
|
12-05-2004, 06:40 PM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Distribution: Mepis, Libranet, Vector, Slackware
Posts: 42
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Afterstep 2.0
I agree 100%. Windowmaker is fantastic. I use it now on my PC at home and on a 2.8ghz cpu, 512mb ram PC at work. Sure i could run one of the heavyweights or windows, but Windowmaker is just so much better. And my menus don't suck like they do in KDE!
But I thought it would look cool to have Afterstep on my laptop. I show it to a lot of Windows users.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|