Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > DamnSmallLinux
User Name
DamnSmallLinux This forum is for the discussion of DamnSmallLinux.


  Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2017, 08:31 AM   #1
Registered: Nov 2012
Location: London
Distribution: Mint 18.2, Fedora 27, NHSbuntu, Ubuntu 15.10
Posts: 328

Rep: Reputation: 10
How much space does it require

I have tried running Linux Mint on an Asus Eee PC 4G 701. It seemed to be progressing until I reached the 'Select a wi-fi', at this point, it wouldn't let me use the arrows to select. I chose to by pass this bit and then it told me that the OS requires 9.2 gB of space and of course mine only has 4gB. Any ideas?

Will Dammsmalllinux work?
Old 08-12-2017, 10:04 AM   #2
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian 9 Stretch
Posts: 2,102
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327
DamnSmall hasn't been updated in a long time. I would recommend a modern Linux distribution, such as Debian. A full XFCE4 desktop install will fit, but it'll be very tight. Instead, I'd go with a minimal install and only adding XFCE4 plus the software you want.

After doing a minimal install, do a lightweight GUI install with:
apt-get install xorg xfce4 lightdm network-manager-gnome
apt-get clean
Depending on the precise hardware in that eeePC, you may have to add the "contrib nonfree" components to /etc/apt/sources.list (append " contrib nonfree" to all source lines after "main"), and then run:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get install firmware-linux-nonfree
You might need to install a non-free wifi module, depending on what's in that eeePC.
Old 08-12-2017, 10:50 AM   #3
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 9,571

Rep: Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813Reputation: 2813
duplicate of
Old 08-13-2017, 10:34 AM   #4
LQ Addict
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,227
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
on an asus eeepc 701, you won't be happy with mint's performance anyways - even if you install a "lightweight" xfce or even mate. (900MHz Celeron)
you should go with something that is actually designed for this sort of extremely underpowered & outdated machine (*) - if you like tinkering, set yourself up with debian oldstable netinstall + some lightweight windowmanager, or maybe use something like antiX or Sparky or puppylinux...

(*) i'm not dissing you, in fact i love these old netbooks and have one myself, but that's just how it is...
Old 08-13-2017, 03:37 PM   #5
Mill J
Registered: Feb 2017
Location: Sweet
Distribution: Linux Mint, Quirky on Rpi and many others
Posts: 173

Rep: Reputation: 19
Go with puppy linux
Old 08-27-2017, 05:24 PM   #6
Registered: Jul 2017
Location: King's Lynn, UK
Distribution: Puppy Linux, AntiX
Posts: 85

Rep: Reputation: 59
^^^ + 1!

I'll second Mill J. For your machine, Puppy really is the way to go. There's a guy called 8Geee who runs a fleet of these old netbooks, and he's built a couple of 'special' Puppy distros specifically for the EeePCs.

You won't find anything that'll run better on one, neither, as they've been specially optimised to take advantage of the wacky hardware Asus used in these things.

No disrespect to Isaac, but he's right; Debian will be a tight fit.....especially with those dozy eMMc drives. Or, if you like the idea of using the Debian model with apt-get and the stable repositories, there's another breed of Puppies known as the DebianDogs. These are really the Debian LiveCD, which have been customized to act, feel & behave like a Puppy.....yet still have all the advantages you get with Debian's famous stability.

If you're interested, you can read about it in the Dogs' development thread on the Puppy Linux Forums:-

I will warn you that there's been some bickering going on recently in this thread. The Dog's originator, Toni from Bulgaria (better known to all as saintless), no longer maintains them, as he had an extended spell of illness which meant he couldn't continue with their development. The guys who 'took over' development began to take them in a totally different direction to that which Toni intended; as a result, he's been accused of deliberately 'disrupting' his own thread..!

Puppy 'politics'. Ugh. Don't get involved.....


Last edited by Mike_Walsh; 08-28-2017 at 03:43 AM.
Old 08-27-2017, 08:34 PM   #7
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Distribution: Debian 9 Stretch
Posts: 2,102
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327Reputation: 327
Debian is NOT a tight fit. It's an easy fit. Only the full default desktop install will be a tight fit. That's because it includes the entirety of LibreOffice and many other things by default. But if you just do a minimal install the way I suggest? It'll fit easily in under 2GB even after adding useful software (in other words, less than half of the available space).

Seriously, I have a keen knowledge of how much Debian will fit in under 4GB because I use RAMBOOT with various computers that have 4GB of RAM. This is a technique where I customize the initrd script to load the entire OS into a tmpfs RAM drive (tmpfs is uncompressed, so performance is incredibly fast). With RAMBOOT, not only does the OS have to fit within the 4GB of RAM, but also all of the normal RAM usage.

Also, I have various USB thumbdrives that I do regular Debian installs on. None of them are very big - only two of them are 8GB in size and all of the rest are smaller. This gives me a very good idea of how much Debian will fit on a 4GB or 2GB or 1GB drive. For 1GB, I don't install a GUI; it's mainly useful as a boot utility. For 512MB or less, it's mainly useful only for /boot, but it's less elegant to maintain than a full install on a 1GB thumbdrive.

But for 2GB and 4GB USB thumbdrives? I put XFCE4 GUI on them. With plain old Debian stable. (There really isn't much of any sort of savings by using oldstable.)
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-08-2017, 12:09 PM   #8
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 4,585

Rep: Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440Reputation: 1440
I'd go for AntiX. That installs software from Debian stable that's specially selected for small or elderly computers: it will take less that 2 of your precious 4GB. Yes, you could make a basic installation of Debian and add more things, but AntiX has already done the job for you.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How much space require for snapshots? hamsaeed Linux - General 2 03-18-2015 05:18 PM
Apache Auth: Using Require User and Require Group newmanium2001 Linux - Software 1 08-25-2009 02:39 PM
My keys (^ ' ~) require a space to print on Swedish keymap. riwaJR Linux - Newbie 2 04-16-2009 05:58 AM
Apache2 Require user with Require group Russianspi Linux - Server 2 01-30-2008 11:21 AM
why does mandiva one require so much space ? nutronix Mandriva 5 05-20-2006 04:56 AM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > DamnSmallLinux

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration