Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > DamnSmallLinux
User Name
DamnSmallLinux This forum is for the discussion of DamnSmallLinux.


  Search this Thread
Old 05-14-2006, 01:40 PM   #1
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2006
Distribution: MX (desktop: XFCE 4)
Posts: 2,153

Rep: Reputation: 77
DSL's browsers

Why does a tiny distro like DSL have at least two web(?) browsers? I understand that it has not only Firefox but a browser called Dillo.
Old 05-14-2006, 03:47 PM   #2
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,040

Rep: Reputation: 47
I don't use DSL, but I imagine it's so you have a choice of a less-resource-hogging browser than Firefox, which is getting to be a bit ungainly. Less resource use would be in keeping with the "Small" in "Damn Small Linux."

Some distros offer four or more browsers, just so there's a choice. Another benefit, though, is that if you have resources to run more than one browser, sometimes you can do things like fill in forms and submit them, with one browser but not with another. I've had to use Opera several times to accomplish tasks on websites that, probably because they are non-standard (their developers probably had MS Explorer in mind), they could do but Firefox, which adheres rigidly to international standards (unlike IE), could not cope with. It's unfortunate this situation exists.
Old 05-15-2006, 10:06 AM   #3
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Swansea, UK
Distribution: Debian Woody
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Dillo is an alpha browser designed to be embedded in mobile phones etc. The executable is ~320 KiB. It is written in pure C and extremely stable. It is brilliant for fast light browsing but has no https yet and no java support.
Old 05-15-2006, 10:39 AM   #4
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 381

Rep: Reputation: 30
dillo is not specially designed for mobile phones. https is implemented but not a default compilation option.
imo dillo becomes really useful only with the patches from
Old 05-15-2006, 09:36 PM   #5
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Phoenix, Az.
Distribution: Xubuntu Edgy
Posts: 330

Rep: Reputation: 30
Is Dillo trying to bite into Operas mobile market then?
Old 05-18-2006, 02:49 PM   #6
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 335

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I've used Firefox, I've used Opera. I've used Konqueror, and I've used IE (*shudder*). Firefox is faster loading IMHO, but Opera seems on par with it otherwise, but I don't think I'd class either as "lite". Maybe in Firefox 2.0 they should reduce code size, system req., ect and just basically minimize the code.

Linux, from my experiance, is alot about choice, hence the numerous programs you'll have for one thing (package managers, browsers, file managers, ect.).


browser, lightweight, ram

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what the hell is DSL's root password ? (su) qwijibow DamnSmallLinux 2 03-21-2004 04:14 PM
Fonts in browsers cordedpoodle Linux - Software 2 10-07-2003 07:09 PM
Other browsers? cordedpoodle Linux - Software 5 09-16-2003 10:00 PM
Browsers? Winux Linux - Newbie 2 04-09-2003 06:46 AM
browsers simon Linux - Software 0 07-26-2001 01:28 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > DamnSmallLinux

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration