ChromeOSThis forum is for the discussion of ChromeOS.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I try to put an old Dell 32 bit desktop to work. There are a lot of Linux distros, but very few for 32 -bit. After trying some 32 bit Linux distros, I give up the approach. Those 32 bit distros are hard to install and not user-friendly (due to their old age, perhaps). Last night, I come across some information about Android for desktop. I give it a try. After running with all android 32 bit OSs, I don't have any luck so far. The furthest I get is android-x86. I get it installed. It doesn't work, however.
Here are some I have tried:
Phoenix OS - I can't find its ISO file specified for 32 bit. The one I got doesn't run at all. I guess it is for 64 bit
Chrome OS - the same as the above
Prime OS - The installation screen shows up, but I can't select any of the menu items to run the live version or install it
Bliss OS - no longer to make 32 -bit
What is the model number and how much RAM is installed in the computer?
Android x86 is not a fully compatible OS with all 32 bit PCs. It has only been tested with a few desktops and tablets and you are better off with using a real 32 bit distribution.
What distribution have you tried? Without knowing the specs of the computer it is difficult to say which distribution would be better suited for your PC.
What is the model number and how much RAM is installed in the computer?
Android x86 is not a fully compatible OS with all 32 bit PCs. It has only been tested with a few desktops and tablets and you are better off with using a real 32 bit distribution.
What distribution have you tried? Without knowing the specs of the computer it is difficult to say which distribution would be better suited for your PC.
Thanks MichaelK. I add the information to my original post.
(There are others, but one of these should sort you out OK.)
Thanks for your info. I have another look at 32 bit Linux distros. This article https://itsfoss.com/32-bit-linux-distributions/ gives a list of 32-bit distros. It mentions a couple of the above. I will try one or two of them. I got a recommendation of Slackware on this site a few months ago. If my memory is correct, I run into some troubles with the dual OS setup.
From what I had read the max is 2GB. You should not have problems installing antix.
I haven't experienced any problems due to hardware limitations to install a Linux distro. I guess that the Android desktop route isn't reality. I run the live Emmabuntüs on the desktop a few hours ago. It was slow and WiFi wasn't working.
I installed and ran android 32 bit os on my clamshell 32 atom touchscreen netbook.
Now. AntiX pretty much stays on it.
when you do a live run. You can post in this thread the output of inxi
Quote:
What is inxi?
Also included in antiX is inxi, another script from h2. inxi is a convenient command line system information script. Run inxi -h for all the options available. To update, run inxi -U as root user to get the updated man page (may be disabled by default).
The most widely used command is probably one that provides a succinct system overview:
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,484
Rep:
AntiX uses window managers, so less resources needed, MX uses XFCE desktop environment, & has more programs included from the start; lots of the people involved work on both distros, they are closely related.
AntiX uses window managers, so less resources needed, MX uses XFCE desktop environment, & has more programs included from the start; lots of the people involved work on both distros, they are closely related.
According to distrowatch.com, MX Linux is the most downloaded distro and the download number of Antix is one-sixth of MX. Less number of applications can make such a big difference.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.