BodhiThis forum is for the discussion of Bodhi Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hello,
earlier today i was trying to install a couple different browsers from their deb files. i got the gdeb installer to open and it did it's thing about finding dependencies, but when i clicked install, absolutely nothing happened.
i was doing this on an older, 32bit machine, and was trying to install the vilvaldi and slimjet browsers. yes, i had downloaded the 32bit deb file of those browsers, NOT the 64bit!
anyone have any idea why they wouldn't work?
thank you
Last edited by fredbisard; 11-19-2019 at 06:54 AM.
hello,
earlier today i was trying to install a couple different browsers from their deb files. i got the gdeb installer to open and it did it's thing about finding dependencies, but when i clicked install, absolutely nothing happened.
i was doing this on an older, 32bit machine, and was trying to install the vilvaldi and slimjet browsers. yes, i had downloaded the 32bit deb file of those browsers, NOT the 64bit!
anyone have any idea why they wouldn't work?
thank you
I am assuming you are running Bodhi linux 5.1. If so and all packages are up to date, see my post on esudo changes.
duh! thought for sure i put in what i was running. yes, bodhi 5. not sure if it's 5.1 or not. what did i download? that part i did put in. says right there, vivaldi and slimjet, 32bit deb files. all packages are up to date.
P.S.: When doing something in terminal, that failed with a GUI app, you'll often see, not only error messages, but hints as to how to work-around whatever went wrong.
For example, Vivaldi: The first time you run it, do so from terminal. Reason: Vivaldi, out of the box, may not handle certain types of video files without a separate download. In terminal, you'll see exactly what's missing, if you don't have it, and what you must do to install it.
This info is not easy to find and 'drove me nuts' at first. But, your system may already have the necessary download, and in that case, just disregard this precaution!
P.P.S.: On my (older, 32-bit) 'netbook' Vivaldi seems to run a bit better than Firefox. No idea why ... but this may also apply to your "older, 32-bit machine".
Last edited by RonCam; 11-17-2019 at 10:02 AM.
Reason: OP has not yet run Vivaldi on an 'older system' so may run into this problem
giving up on this as nothing seems to work. going to assume these 2 browsers aren't compatible with bodhi. reinstalled gdeb and tried. same thing. nothing happens after gdeb open. trying the command line says file not found!
think i'm going to put linux mint back on this machine.
The file name being boldfaced, for clarity, seems to have corrupted the line, preventing it from being used 'as a link'.
I tried it because I was curious as to what could have happened. To start the download, one would have to 'Select' the entire line, copy it, then paste it into a browser's address bar. It works only if the link one places in the address bar includes the file name.
Sorry about that, but the point of the post was only so that you could compare the filename, as shown in boldface, with the name of the file you had already downloaded and attempted to install.
P.S.: The original post works as a link now, but you wouldn't be able to see the filename for comparison, with what you already downloaded. For that, you'd have to refer to the 'quote' in your post, which preserves its original form.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.