LinuxQuestions.org

	speed up your browsing experience my router runs linux as well. resolving depends on remote servers(as my router has simple recursive DNS), if I query record for the first time. my ISP DNS servers are quite laggy that's why I'm off to my own one. I also don't like someone watching my dns queries, one more reason to use own recursive server, instead of ISP's or, of course, Google's
	Posted 07-30-2010 at 03:48 AM by Web31337 Updated 07-30-2010 at 03:50 AM by Web31337

	speed up your browsing experience as far as I'm concerned there is a significant improvement in my browsing experience from the time I changed my dns server to google's
	Posted 07-29-2010 at 08:55 AM by ultimate_linux

	speed up your browsing experience ping time is more,its okay what about the algorithm(software) that converts the URL to ip address. google uses the best algorithms and most of its servers run linux,so you can expect good performance. who knows your ISP may use a dns server running windows.
	Posted 07-29-2010 at 08:53 AM by ultimate_linux Updated 07-29-2010 at 08:56 AM by ultimate_linux

speed up your browsing experience

but,opera and firefox are definitely the best browsers.
browser faceoff

Posted 07-29-2010 at 08:00 AM by ultimate_linux
speed up your browsing experience

agreed.

Posted 07-29-2010 at 07:57 AM by ultimate_linux

speed up your browsing experience

there is a difference between this:

Code:

$ ping 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=63.6 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=64.1 ms
^C

and this:

Code:

$ ping 192.168.168.192
PING 192.168.168.192 (192.168.168.192) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.168.192: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.144 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.168.192: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.123 ms
^C

I lose at least 60 msec using your method, how is that faster than having local recursive DNS or one offered by your ISP?
what of browser I'm quite comfortable with opera & firefox.

Posted 07-28-2010 at 05:22 PM by Web31337 Web31337 is offline

alternative to rm command

There is still no sub for frequent backups and organisation.

Posted 06-20-2010 at 07:36 PM by 2ck
alternative to rm command

NOTE:the path of trash can also be ~/.local/share/Trash

Posted 06-19-2010 at 06:45 AM by ultimate_linux
alternative to rm command

thank you my dear friend.

Posted 06-17-2010 at 11:13 AM by ultimate_linux
alternative to rm command

yep, you are right, this did has a great help for recovering!!!!

Posted 06-16-2010 at 09:00 PM by twwwater