Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Sorry, didn't see your comment until now. I'll try to find a leaked copy of the manual for you and post it here.
Answer to the second question: only the US FBI (or even better, the US courts, who according to the US Constitution should decide such questions) can explain more fully what the criteria are, but it seems obvious that the intent is to prevent "plain jane" netizens who just start something labeled "blog", like this one, from arguing that under the new rules an FBI agent would at least need to seek approval from a supervisor before rummaging through the author's private life. When I find the link you can read it yourself and see what you think they mean.
Posted 09-03-2011 at 09:02 PM byPeufelon Updated 09-03-2011 at 09:07 PM byPeufelon
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.