LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-22-2010, 07:53 AM   #1
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Rep: Reputation: 79
Wanting to give Arch a try, but having installation issues


I have the base and base-devel installed on my drive and arch boots up fine. I get logged in without problems, but I can go no further. If I try to install any of the desktop environments, I can't. I did pacman -S gnome and get an error about api-linux-headers conflict with kernel headers and it wants to know if I want to remove kernel headers. If I hit yes, it gives another error about e2fsprogs conflicting with something else. (sorry can't remember them all, going from memory). It asks if I want to remove e2fsprogs. If I say yes, is gives errors saying a bunch of programs require e2fsprogs. I get other errors, with KDE, but still the e2fsprogs conflict error. Most of the programs requiring e2fs are filesystems, openssh, smbclient and one or two more. Nothing out of the ordinary. Trying to install xorg and gdm also spits out conflict errors with e2fsprogs.

open to suggestions.
 
Old 02-22-2010, 08:02 AM   #2
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740
There are some quirks....

On thing I learned recently is that the maintainers/experts urge you to always do a system upgrade before installing anything.

Semi-related: I recently configured one system using the "rankmirrors" utility (See the arch wiki page on mirrors.) I think it was in the same article that they talk about using "pacman -Syy" to ensure that everything syncs properly.

So, from a fresh install:
setup the mirrors
run "pacman -Syy"
run "pacman -Su"
Then try to install desired SW.
 
Old 02-22-2010, 08:31 AM   #3
reed9
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
I'll second everything Pixellany said. As as an FYI, I highly recommend adding Xyne's repository right at the beginning and install a tool called bauerbill. (Xyne has written a number of great tools for Arch.) Bauerbill is an extension of powerpill which is a wrapper for pacman, which can significantly speed up downloads. When you're first installing X and a desktop environment and all that, it's profoundly useful. Also, it gives you easy access to the AUR.

Just add
Code:
[xyne-any]
Server = http://xyne.archlinux.ca/repos/any
to /etc/pacman.conf.

Then (after you've updated as above)
Code:
pacman -Syy bauerbill

Last edited by reed9; 02-22-2010 at 11:42 AM.
 
Old 02-22-2010, 08:34 AM   #4
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 79
thanks guys, I'll give it a try
 
Old 02-22-2010, 09:53 AM   #5
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 79
well, I agree with there being a few quirks. I ran pacman -Syy and pacman -Su. That updated 3 packages. tried to install gnome and got same errors. Looked around on google and the Arch wiki and ran pacman -Syu. This updated the entire system. ran pacman -S gnome. So far so good. Still downloading the packages. So fingers crossed
 
Old 02-22-2010, 10:34 AM   #6
reed9
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
Quote:
I ran pacman -Syy and pacman -Su.
This should have been the same as
Code:
pacman -Syyu
Which is the same as
Code:
pacman -Syu
except that it forces a refresh of all the package lists even if it thinks they are current. (The two 'y's instead of one.)

So it's odd that the first only updated a couple packages and the second time it updated everything.

Quote:
ran pacman -S gnome. So far so good. Still downloading the packages.
But glad things seem to be going well. As I said, if you use bauerbill or powerpill instead of pacman, it uses reflector to generate a mirror list and aria2 to segment downloads and connect to multiple servers, cutting down your download time.
Code:
bauerbill -Syu --rebase --build-as $USER
 
Old 02-22-2010, 11:32 AM   #7
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740Reputation: 740
So now we all agree that Arch has quirks...

Over the weekend, I was looking for my list of "quirkless" distros, but I can't find it anywhere.....

@reed9;
Thanks for the info on the alternative package managers---now high on my todo list.
 
Old 02-22-2010, 11:48 AM   #8
reed9
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 142Reputation: 142
I just noticed that I linked back to this post and not Xyne's repo above, so that is corrected.

There is also another fairly new pacman alternative, packer. It's good for the AUR, but doesn't do segmented downloads like bauerbill/powerpill. But it's a little simpler. Bauerbill you pretty much have to alias it to simpler commands, or it gets a little obnoxious.

And I always thought those weren't quirks in Arch, they were features.
 
Old 02-22-2010, 12:28 PM   #9
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 79
I would rather have quirks than than the alternative
 
Old 02-22-2010, 05:25 PM   #10
bret381
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Alabama
Distribution: Arch x86_64
Posts: 650

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 79
well, looks like I have a working Arch desktop. Thanks for the help guys
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help with Arch installation Rockem Arch 5 09-13-2009 10:00 AM
Issues with freetype in Xorg in Arch BlackFedora Linux - Newbie 2 06-17-2009 04:42 AM
Arch installation ultrapup Arch 8 04-17-2009 09:40 AM
Wanting to give back to the Linux community sgmeunier LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 2 06-02-2006 10:48 AM
Arch has fundamental personality issues otchie1 Arch 13 11-23-2005 08:16 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration