LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2012, 01:49 PM   #1
Unwind_Shane
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Indiana, USA
Distribution: Unwind Linux 2012 RC2 (own distro)
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Making my own Arch-based distro


Hi guys. Just joined the Linux Questions Forums.

I thought I'd tell you guys I'm working on my own Linux distro - nothing really serious, just something to work on and take some time. It is Arch-based and is currently under development.

The website is http://unwindlinux.org/. Currently no release is out but one should be out by today, if not August.

The selling point is to be friendly while not including a bunch of extra stuff. You get a browser, package manager, desktop, and the typical GNU tools. The interesting part is that the main developer, me, is 17 years old, however, I don't think that affects who develops it. It depends on the developer's maturity in my opinion.

Any thoughts/suggestions/help?
 
Old 07-23-2012, 01:26 PM   #2
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unwind_Shane View Post
Any thoughts...
My only thought, apart from the unhelpful '...but we have enough distros already...', is that the better that you can define the target user group as a distinct group with known likes and dislikes, the more likely you are to be successful.

By targeting, I don't really mean the trivial stuff like 'people who like green backgrounds', or something, but 'people who want the latest software, because they are techno-savvy, but don't want to do a lot of messing around to get it' (or their opposite, in some ways, '...people who get a buzz from fiddling around with their computer and still have it working afterwards...').

It has to be a worthwhile sub-set of users (so, not people who type 'a' a lot, nor people who have a dislike of cats) and not just any old grouping ('people from 19 to 32.5 years old' is not only arbitrary, but they don't really have shared characteristics that allow you to take decisions based on their particular preferences, because their preferences will be all over the place).

The better that you define a group, or a few similar groups, of people that you think should like what you are trying to do, the better is the chance that you can provide them with what they want....as opposed to, say, some user interface that no one really wants, apart from the developers, and which irritates the hell out of everybody. I'll leave you to work out who that might be.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-29-2012, 06:59 AM   #3
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: No distribution. OpenBSD operating system
Posts: 1,705
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 633Reputation: 633Reputation: 633Reputation: 633Reputation: 633Reputation: 633
As salasi pointed out, there are already too many distros, so:
1) Your distro should offer something the rest do not or do things a better way.
2) Keep in mind the kind of people the system is meant for. People who prefer the command line, people who prefer a GUI, people who want to do as little work as possible during package management, people who want to compile from source, et cetera.
3) What about package repositories? Do you want to create and maintain your own. (A team of developers required.) Or do you plan to use an existing distro's repositories?

With the second point in mind, what is the target demographic?
Quote:
The selling point is to be friendly while not including a bunch of extra stuff.
Quote:
It is Arch-based and is currently under development.
A user-friendly Arch? To making Arch "friendly", you might need to delay up-dating packages, until they are stable. Most people do not consider frequent bugs and crashes friendly. However, this could cause difficulty if using Arch's repositories (point #3), making extra work for your team.

I do not mean to be discouraging. I simply want to give you some idea of the things you need to consider before delving too deeply. You need to think about everything that is required and plan a development strategy for the first few years. Once the full plan is place, finish developing the distro.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Making a debian based distro rmckayfleming Linux - General 24 12-30-2013 04:44 AM
[SOLVED] Making a FreeBSD based distro lonesoac0 *BSD 13 03-18-2011 02:39 AM
LAN Gaming distro based on Arch Person_1873 Linux - General 2 01-13-2011 07:32 AM
Making a new distro based off Ubuntu BlahBlah_X Ubuntu 4 01-02-2007 01:47 PM
need help making USB based distro tuneout Linux - General 2 08-25-2005 11:24 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration