ArchThis Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
and just tried to install arch and it was laughable. Got a list of unresolved dependencies that must have been a 1000 lines long. I started with redhat 5.0 was a loyal mandrake user for a while, had a gentoo installation for years, but from what i just saw in the install rountine, i guess i will never be an arch linux user. Bless you all for your patience, i guess i measure up short in that department
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
and just tried to install arch and it was laughable. Got a list of unresolved dependencies that must have been a 1000 lines long. I started with redhat 5.0 was a loyal mandrake user for a while, had a gentoo installation for years, but from what i just saw in the install rountine, i guess i will never be an arch linux user. Bless you all for your patience, i guess i measure up short in that department
Is there a question in there?
If you do not want to install Arch, that's certainly OK. If you DO want to, then I can assure you that your experience was not typical.
Preferred way is to install with a net-install iso, always fresh!
Arch Linux is about choices, actually, you're the tailor of your of your own distro not one will be the same.
From The Arch Way
Quote:
The design principles behind Arch are aimed at keeping it simple.
'Simple', in this context, shall mean 'without unnecessary additions, modifications, or complications'. In short; an elegant, minimalist approach.
This does not mean that Arch is a simple click and go Linux distribution like most popular releases. Distro specific gotchas?, yes you need to edit a lot of things by hand and no it's not a mouseclick away.
A good install routine shouldnt even make a mismatch like that possible. I may try it again but probably wont, i have a distro that installs easily and avoids most of the distro specific gotchas. Thanks for the input tho.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.