LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password
Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2012, 08:58 PM   #1
Mercury305
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Distribution: CrunchBang / Ubuntu
Posts: 540

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Arch Stability due to rolling release?


I was curious on using Arch lately as I have never tried. Mostly used Fedora, Centos and Slackware distros. The one thing I have been hearing is the breakages that happen due to updates with the rolling release system. How often do these problems happen in Arch?
 
Old 12-24-2012, 09:28 PM   #2
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Rolling release is by definition "unstable" in the sense of "tending strongly to change, not constant, fluctuating." (definition from thefreedictionary.com/unstable)

That being said, Arch is a popular and high-quality distribution. Many users successfully run it with minimal breakage with the help of the update warnings on archlinux.org (always check there before updating), the excellent wiki, and the Arch forums. I personally prefer a stable distribution (Debian, CentOS, Slackware, Ubuntu, etc.) but my experiments with Arch have been overwhelmingly positive, I would recommend it without hesitation for someone seeking a rolling release for whatever reason.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-24-2012, 09:35 PM   #3
Mercury305
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Distribution: CrunchBang / Ubuntu
Posts: 540

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpine View Post
Rolling release is by definition "unstable" in the sense of "tending strongly to change, not constant, fluctuating." (definition from thefreedictionary.com/unstable)

That being said, Arch is a popular and high-quality distribution. Many users successfully run it with minimal breakage with the help of the update warnings on archlinux.org (always check there before updating), the excellent wiki, and the Arch forums. I personally prefer a stable distribution (Debian, CentOS, Slackware, Ubuntu, etc.) but my experiments with Arch have been overwhelmingly positive, I would recommend it without hesitation for someone seeking a rolling release for whatever reason.
Thanks for the Reply, I have been reading the wiki about it. To be honest I pretty much like almost everything about Arch except for the "rolling release" part. I kept questioning in my mind how can this distro keep going without breaking if any user can just upload the new repos without having tested first. At least Fedora updates are tested to a degree... However I am not too familiar with how Arch's updates are tested. Also another important thing about systems is the incompatibility issue between packages. I guess distros with a release schedule tend to focus a lot more on the overall compatibility of packages to make sure things don't crash as often.

Even though Fedora is considered a "testing distro for RHEL" I must admit that it felt more "Stable" then using Ubuntu. I definitely prefer Ubuntu's software Repo over Fedora's however, the amount of bloatware and the design of the clunky system has totally pushed me away from using Ubuntu so I stopped using it and switched to Fedora instead.

I was wondering if maybe the same could be true about Arch? If it might be more stable then Fedora due to its Minimalist design and lack of bloat.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-24-2012, 09:39 PM   #4
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Arch, like most distros, has a Testing repo.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...#.5Btesting.5D
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-24-2012, 09:41 PM   #5
Mercury305
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Rockville, MD
Distribution: CrunchBang / Ubuntu
Posts: 540

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowpine View Post
Arch, like most distros, has a Testing repo.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...#.5Btesting.5D
I consider this thread solved wasn't thinking clearly. Thank you again. I will be trying out Arch very soon... hope all is good.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rolling release? McZ Linux From Scratch 4 11-18-2012 12:36 PM
How is Arch'es stability compared to Fedora's? Mr. Alex Linux - Distributions 6 06-06-2011 04:45 PM
Rolling release distribution ShadowReaper Linux - Distributions 6 09-13-2010 09:10 AM
LFS rolling release? jpheber Linux From Scratch 1 08-23-2010 02:27 AM
Rolling Release distros? jduvall Linux - Newbie 10 07-03-2010 10:57 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Arch

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration