Arch This Forum is for the discussion of Arch Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
04-12-2012, 03:11 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it.
Posts: 1,238
Rep:
|
About Arch orphan packages
Hi!
If a package is orphan in AUR - it means that the maintainer no longer supports it. And if a package is orphan in the system - it means it was not installed explicitly and is not needed by any other package. Right?
And are there orphans in official repos?
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 06:15 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2010
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,632
|
As far as I'm aware, that is correct.
From the Arch fora: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=50869
From the man pages for pacman:
Quote:
This option can be combined with -t for listing real orphans - packages that were installed as dependencies but are no longer required by any installed packaged.
|
Regarding the last question, it appears there are: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...ts#Orphan_Team
Regards,
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
04-12-2012, 07:30 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it.
Posts: 1,238
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Internal_Projects#Orphan_Team
Responsible for caring for those packages that no one seems to want
|
How do maintainers know if noone is interested in a package. AFAIK pacman doesn't send any information about its usage to Arch developers.
|
|
|
04-12-2012, 07:38 AM
|
#4
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
|
I think you misunderstood that. The orphan teams looks for packages that no one wants to maintain, not for packages that nobody is using.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
04-13-2012, 08:29 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2010
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,632
|
Has that answered your question? If so, please mark the thread as [SOLVED]
Thanks,
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
04-13-2012, 01:33 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it.
Posts: 1,238
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yeah, thanks to everybody, those posts answered the question.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|