2019 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2019 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite projects/products of 2019. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 12th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My experience is limited with Clipboard managers with only Parcellite. But, after using Parcellite for a while now I like it and it meets my needs. So, I cast my vote for Parcellite.
I noticed that clipit & parcellite are near identical.
I've been using clipit for ages, but now discovered that parcellite is in [community] while clipit is "only" in the AUR.
Voted parcellite.
What are some main advantages of any of these over the clipboard manager built into KDE? Just curious if it is worth exploring since I've never felt like something is missing from it.
Clipman works for me. Of course, that comes with XFCE. It IS lightweight, but after years of using it I don't miss any additional features too much from the one I used in MS XP years ago: Ditto (and that was an add-on with a ton of features, not light at all. But at least it came with GPL-3) Apparently Copy-Q comes pretty close if you're used to Ditto on the other OS.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.