2019 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2019 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite projects/products of 2019. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 12th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Chromium and I never log in. I build it from scratch for FreeBSD and although it takes a couple hours or so to build, it works very well. I don't care about lightweight, I want functionality, security and I want sites to render properly.
I could run Firefox on multiple x86, x64 and Android without problems. The browser integration with the KDE Plasma Desktop was improved the last year with success. Complements and addons are pretty good. Pocket and password manager are awesome.
Firefox for me...despite all the bad stuff.
I somewhat want to use qutebrowser but for some reason it keeps giving me grief, not working right, but my desire to use it doesn't exceed superficial troubleshooting, and it requires more than that.
Edit:
Ah, yes, python and webkit stuff, always turns me off. Bleh.
The browser I always most use is Firefox, but because my favourite computer is a 32bit one, I at last discovered with pleasure Palemoon, which sadly recently also stopped support for 32bit machines. Still, Palemoon 28.6.1 32bit, is still very up to date, and therefore at the moment my favourite browser.
The browser I always most use is Firefox, but because my favourite computer is a 32bit one, I at last discovered with pleasure Palemoon, which sadly recently also stopped support for 32bit machines. Still, Palemoon 28.6.1 32bit, is still very up to date, and therefore at the moment my favourite browser.
Where did you get that piece of incorrect information from?
Palemoon is a very popular browser for many of my fellow Puppy Linux users, mainly due to the vast assortment of elderly hardware most of us run.
I'm posting this from the current 32-bit version, in Bionicpup32 8.0. It's up to v28.8.0 ATM.....and, according to the guy who compiles the Linux builds, NewTobinParadigm, having sorted out the 32-bit build environment a couple of months back, the 32-bit Linux version is set to remain 'stable' & 'available' for the forseeable future.
You can get the 'official' versions for both 32- and 64-bit Linux, direct from this Palemoon downloads page:-
Where did you get that piece of incorrect information from?
Palemoon is a very popular browser for many of my fellow Puppy Linux users, mainly due to the vast assortment of elderly hardware most of us run.
I'm posting this from the current 32-bit version, in Bionicpup32 8.0. It's up to v28.8.0 ATM.....and, according to the guy who compiles the Linux builds, NewTobinParadigm, having sorted out the 32-bit build environment a couple of months back, the 32-bit Linux version is set to remain 'stable' & 'available' for the forseeable future.
You can get the 'official' versions for both 32- and 64-bit Linux, direct from this Palemoon downloads page:-
Hi Mike. You have no idea how happy I am to be wrong..., well at least till I've succesfully checked the link you've sent here. The information came from Palemoon itself. My 32bit PCLinuxOS 2012 distribution wasn't supported anymore. By the way, PCLinuxOS in any case does not support 32bit computers anymore since some years. I will leave some feedback here once the latest Palemoon test done. In any case thank you very much for your observation. Paul
Hi Mike. You have no idea how happy I am to be wrong..., well at least till I've succesfully checked the link you've sent here. The information came from Palemoon itself. My 32bit PCLinuxOS 2012 distribution wasn't supported anymore. By the way, PCLinuxOS in any case does not support 32bit computers anymore since some years. I will leave some feedback here once the latest Palemoon test done. In any case thank you very much for your observation. Paul
Yes Mike, you're right ! The latest Palemoon version 28.8.0 does indeed run very well on my 32bit PCLinuxOS 2012 Linux distribution. Meaning I do apologize, and thank you for the useful information. Paul
Yes Mike, you're right ! The latest Palemoon version 28.8.0 does indeed run very well on my 32bit PCLinuxOS 2012 Linux distribution. Meaning I do apologize, and thank you for the useful information. Paul
No worries, mate. There is so much conflicting information out there (and a lot that is simply unclear), that you need to go through everything with a fine tooth-comb....
BTW, I don't know which Puppy you're running, but I build a self-contained, 'portable' version of Palemoon for the community (if you're interested, that is). This can be run from literally anywhere.....even a flashdrive, in the manner of the Windows PortableApps.
You can find the thread for it on the Murga-Linux 'Puppy' Forums, here:-
(Don't worry about the fact it's an older version in my cloud a/c; 28-series PaleMoons now auto-update in the same manner as Firefox, so you'll be offered the upgrade to the current 28.8.0 before you've been browsing for very long.)
Just download, and follow the instructions for use in the thread.
Mike.
Last edited by Mike_Walsh; 01-09-2020 at 11:32 AM.
Thank you Mike. One thing you should know is that Palemoon versions after 28.6.2 did indeed NOT work with 32bit PCLinuxOS ! Meaning it wasn't bad information only... That's why I'm now so happy, and a bit surprised, that version 28.8.0 you mentioned here actually DOES work. By the way : thank you also for the Puppy information. When using Puppy, it's mostly Lupu. Best Wishes man. Paul
You mean they didn't work with your outdated version of PCLinuxOS?
Well, although this is out of topic, everything depend on what is meant with "outdated". For most things I do, the PCLinuxOS 2012 version is not at all outdated. The softwares I use still do the job they were meant to do, and this in the most satisfactory way. Everything is relative man. And by the way, thanks to Mike_Walsh I'm now writing this post with the help of Palemoon's latest version... 32bit, and it works ! The only possible danger would be the Internet, a bit as with AIDS: no danger if one has no sexual contact with other people, or stays in a closed relationship. No offence meant, but many (not all) software updates are useless, annoying and leading to sluggish performances.
This being pointed out, I do have another computer (64bit) running the most up to date version of PCLinuxOS (KDE5 2019-10), but still prefer the older version. I also run other versions of Linux and Windows, even Mac OS 9, depending of my mood and the stuff that needs to be done.
Last edited by colinetsegers; 01-11-2020 at 05:40 AM.
Reason: Orthography
Well, although this is out of topic, everything depend on what is meant with "outdated". For most things I do, the PCLinuxOS 2012 version is not at all outdated. The softwares I use still do the job they were meant to do, and this in the most satisfactory way. Everything is relative man.
There's objective ways of defining "outdated" - one is surely the distro maintainers stance on that (things like "support cycle" or "end of support" or "end of life", which I could not find on their website on a glance), and another very important one is security from malicious software & intrusions from the internet.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.