LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2017 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2017 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2017 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite projects/products of 2017. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th.


Notices


View Poll Results: Lightweight Distribution of the Year
antiX 33 27.27%
ArchBang 17 14.05%
Puppy Linux 36 29.75%
Slax 18 14.88%
Tiny Core Linux 11 9.09%
WattOS 2 1.65%
Q4OS 4 3.31%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2018, 11:40 AM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,431

Rep: Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988Reputation: 3988
Lightweight Distribution of the Year


A new category this year. What distribution do you think is best suited for a lightweight environment?

--jeremy
 
Old 01-03-2018, 12:13 PM   #2
Timothy Miller
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Arizona, USA
Distribution: Debian, EndeavourOS
Posts: 3,656
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294Reputation: 1294
My favorite is q4os.
 
Old 01-04-2018, 05:26 AM   #3
ondoho
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 17,231
Blog Entries: 10

Rep: Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160Reputation: 5160
the term "lightweight" is highly controversial, its meaning much depends on the users age/perception.
and the choice of distros is extremely limited; there's so many choices, a poll doesn't really make sense here.

there's a window of linux usability on older hardware, imho it's about ten years.
when that window closes, what distro still has a high chance of succesfully installing without too much fuss?
that would be a more interesting question.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 07:05 AM   #4
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 711

Rep: Reputation: 264Reputation: 264Reputation: 264
Slax, because Slackware. But I would also assume Void to be lightweight...
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 07:52 AM   #5
anticapitalista
antiX
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, fluxbox, IceWM and jwm.
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 165Reputation: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe View Post
Slax, because Slackware. But I would also assume Void to be lightweight...
Slax is now based on Debian. Have you used Void to see if your assumption is correct?
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 07:53 AM   #6
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 711

Rep: Reputation: 264Reputation: 264Reputation: 264
Eww.

I actually use Void, see my signature.
 
Old 01-04-2018, 08:03 AM   #7
anticapitalista
antiX
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX using herbstluftwm, fluxbox, IceWM and jwm.
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 165Reputation: 165
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe View Post
Eww.

I actually use Void, see my signature.
So, would you say it is lightweight? Would you use it on a P4 with 1GB RAM, for example?
If so, request it be added to the list of options.

Last edited by anticapitalista; 01-04-2018 at 08:03 AM. Reason: typos
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 08:10 AM   #8
YesItsMe
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 711

Rep: Reputation: 264Reputation: 264Reputation: 264
The "minimal" Void system with musl should work fine on a P4. I don't really have a machine from that time ready as of now, so I won't guarantee it yet. At least they claim that a P4 is enough.
 
Old 01-04-2018, 03:50 PM   #9
rokytnji
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Waaaaay out West Texas
Distribution: AntiX 19
Posts: 6,309
Blog Entries: 21

Rep: Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166Reputation: 3166
AntiX
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 03:52 PM   #10
linustalman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Debian 10 (Buster) x64
Posts: 4,564

Rep: Reputation: 445Reputation: 445Reputation: 445Reputation: 445Reputation: 445
antiX FTW!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 04:03 PM   #11
JWJones
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,430

Rep: Reputation: 696Reputation: 696Reputation: 696Reputation: 696Reputation: 696Reputation: 696
antiX, and a hat-tip to anticapitalista for his continued excellent work on it.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 04:05 PM   #12
linustalman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Debian 10 (Buster) x64
Posts: 4,564

Rep: Reputation: 445Reputation: 445Reputation: 445Reputation: 445Reputation: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWJones View Post
antiX, and a hat-tip to anticapitalista for his continued excellent work on it.
+1 The antiX & MX team are doing excellent work.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-04-2018, 10:00 PM   #13
_roman_
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2017
Location: _Austro_Bavaria_
Distribution: gentoo / linux mint
Posts: 433

Rep: Reputation: 29
I miss gentoo

As I only use a few components from each desktop environment for example

I only use a few components each from anything. and I can remove functionality with use-flags.

I do not know any binary distro which comes close

--

Voted nothing as it is heavily binary distro biased

and up to discussion what is leightweight.

arch linux / slackware / linux mint which i used past few years or tried are all bloated definitely
 
Old 01-04-2018, 10:03 PM   #14
TheTKS
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Location: The deep south... of Canada
Distribution: Slackware, Xubuntu, OpenBSD, elementary, Raspberry Pi OS, Puppy, TinyCore
Posts: 251

Rep: Reputation: 152Reputation: 152
Puppy, but also use Tiny Core sometimes.

My lightest weight *installed* is Xubuntu - runs fast enough on an 11-year old 64 bit single core machine (not noticeably slower than Lubuntu; Ubuntu was just *that much* too slow.)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-08-2018, 10:10 PM   #15
Lucko666
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Location: Olympia WA
Distribution: Mint, Raspbian, Debian, elementaryOS, LinuxLite, Puppy, Manjaro, Armbian
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Pixel PC (Raspian OS for Intel chips)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: antiX A Fast And Lightweight Linux Distribution LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-15-2017 11:30 PM
LXer: Is Xfce Still a Lightweight Distribution? LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-30-2015 01:41 PM
LXer: Livarp Ė A lightweight Linux Distribution LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-28-2013 06:22 PM
Need lightweight Linux distribution for making live CD/flashdrive morph2 Linux - Software 7 02-09-2013 08:03 PM
LXer: Linux Distribution: Lightweight Portable Security LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-01-2010 08:00 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2017 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration