2017 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2017 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite projects/products of 2017. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i guess strictly speaking it's the shell that helps you manage files?
i agree; i use bash (on urxvt) more and more often. it gets better the more you start understanding the finer settings. tab completion, mostly.
My file manager of choice is cli! I decided long ago that graphical file managers are simply too slow and clumsy for me. They drive me up the wall. I don't even have one installed on Crux or LFS. Debian/LXDE includes one, I believe, but I never use it.
With half a dozen two-letter commands, I can do anything I want in a flash.
Agree on this, CLI works best. Graphical file managers works best to kill the time. LOL.
Not that I ever liked nautilus but isn't this standard on Mate which alot of people use?
How come it wasn't nominated. Maybe everyone dislikes it as much as I do?
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,235
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FungalNet
Not that I ever liked nautilus but isn't this standard on Mate which alot of people use?
How come it wasn't nominated. Maybe everyone dislikes it as much as I do?
Caja (a fork of Nautilus) is the default for MATE.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
