LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2014. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 3rd.


Notices


View Poll Results: Server Distribution of the Year
CentOS 162 30.74%
Debian 89 16.89%
Gentoo 11 2.09%
Mandriva Enterprise Server 0 0%
Oracle Enterprise Linux 2 0.38%
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 40 7.59%
Scientific Linux 5 0.95%
Slackware 153 29.03%
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 1.71%
Ubuntu LTS 56 10.63%
Voters: 527. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2014, 09:34 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,448

Rep: Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329Reputation: 3329
Server Distribution of the Year


What distribution do you think is best suited for a server environment?

--jeremy
 
Old 12-15-2014, 10:19 PM   #2
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=14, FreeBSD_10{.0|.1|.2}
Posts: 4,506
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421Reputation: 2421
Still Slackware!
 
Old 12-15-2014, 11:45 PM   #3
sycamorex
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,825
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221Reputation: 1221
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrogeek View Post
Still Slackware!
What the man said.
 
Old 12-16-2014, 09:46 AM   #4
Ook
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Hell, Arizona
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 531

Rep: Reputation: 92
I use Slackware for my development machine, my gaming machines, and all of my servers. I replaced Ubuntu with Slackware and several problems went away. And the nice thing about using the exact same distro as a dev machine and server is that I configure them the same. No more of this "well, it works in the dev environment, idk why it won't work in production" problems. If it works in my dev environment, then it works in my production environment.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-16-2014, 09:28 PM   #5
notKlaatu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Distribution: Slackware, Fedora
Posts: 1,024

Rep: Reputation: 666Reputation: 666Reputation: 666Reputation: 666Reputation: 666Reputation: 666
Slackware. Slack Here.
 
Old 12-17-2014, 07:29 AM   #6
kooru
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,385

Rep: Reputation: 273Reputation: 273Reputation: 273
Still Slackware
 
Old 12-17-2014, 08:45 AM   #7
fatmac
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: AntiX
Posts: 1,950

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Debian, then & now.
 
Old 12-17-2014, 11:00 AM   #8
steeladept
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Dilemma, dilemma. CentOS or Debian. Like Debian better personally but use CentOS on a daily basis at work so I know it quite a bit better. Both? No? Okay...I will go with Debian then because I like Apt Package Manager better than YUM and/or RPM.
 
Old 12-17-2014, 04:06 PM   #9
wayward4now
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 67

Rep: Reputation: 7
Debian for sure.

My first install was Slackware from a stack of floppies back when. I am in "gift-debt" to Slackware.

But, I installed RedHat as soon as the first CD came out, and a little later, Caldera. RedHat hired me in 1999 and I quit in 2000 over some personal legal problems. Step ahead 5 years and I found I had to install Fedora after RedHat dumped "users". Fedora blew up too routinely then, and I installed Ubuntu <gasp!> It was like dumping a bad mistress to switch. You knew she was unfaithful, yet you still loved her in some befuddled dysfunctional way.

But, she didn't love me back in a way I found fulfilling, so I switched to Debian. Wheezy is older than history, so I painfully upgraded to Jessie. Jessie is good, I am happy there, EVEN WITH SYSTEMD. It works, so I have no dog in the fight and from all of the 5 or 6 anti-systemd posters, who routinely poison the support list, (they must not have much in the way of social or professional lives) I have not read one really good well-reasoned argument against. Yet, I vote Debian as they have the packages and really good maintainers.
 
Old 12-17-2014, 10:07 PM   #10
touch21st
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2013
Location: Australia
Distribution: Fedora, Suse,Android, FreeBSD,Kali
Posts: 92
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1
What about SUSE?
 
Old 12-17-2014, 10:11 PM   #11
Alvin Chey
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Singapore
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0 Stable (64-bit)
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 9
Thumbs up Using Slackware64 14.0 for production server

I am currently using Slackware64 14.0 for a production server for more than 1.5years.
Was installed on a bare Dell server 2 XEON CPU >4Gb RAM with Hardware RAID card.

The following are the my wins:

1. After setting up the server's Hardware RAID, Slackware installs normally without any complaint.

2. Slackware's package management enables patches to be installed when you decide it is the best time.
Thanks for great support from Slackware team. (Patches includes fix for bash shell shock issue!)

3. Slackware's package management enables you to easily store the patches offline. This makes for easy
way to have a simple configuration management of the server.

4. Slackbuild offers a great way make your own packages and necessary updates even to base packages,
if necessary. You can choose *not* to use the latest version of any dependent library of your
package; just stick with the existing stable version as long as version meets requirement of
package you're building.

5. Great uptime! (never down since commissioning the production server)

6. Easy to configure disks, samba shares, network, MySQL, httpd, cron jobs. Easy to manage as a
headless server.

7. Great community of Slackware users, developers, visitors in linuxquestions.org. (But there are
many other resources outside LQ too by the community)

Currently, I am thinking of how to move to Slackware64 14.1 (or later) .. but I don't feel rushed.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-19-2014, 09:31 AM   #12
SamanthaCruz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
SuSE Linux Enterprise Server

From the perspective of an Enterprise environment with over 1600 Linux Servers; Quality support is absolutely critical; downtime is expensive and whenever we have an issue we need to identify the cause quickly to restore operations and avoid future outages; On this front nothing I've seen from any other distro compares to the quality and ease of support from SuSE.

The supportconfig utility makes gathering most of the commonly needed support log and configuration data quite fast and easy.

Their automated supportconfig analyzer does a pretty good job of identifying common configuration issues and alerting about security related patches and specific fixes but one of the best parts of that tool is that we can add our own profiles to it very easily which allows us to create checks that identify issues that are specific to our environment or hardware so we can easily check the entire enterprise.

the analyzevmcore process allows us to analyze crash dumps very easily in house; in many cases we have used it to identify root cause within 10 minutes of a crash.

cons:

They do tend to be slower with bringing out the latest versions of every package than other distributions. That is certainly a mixed bag; our systems are quite stable and I suspect that's in large part because they aren't pushing out frequent package updates without extensive testing unless there is a major issue

Their default annual registration process is a pain and seems to fail quite frequently; especially when the servers have to go through a proxy server to connect to their registration site. - They have a free "SuSE License Management" product that consolidates all of those registrations - that makes it a lot easier but we still have to manually enter new activation codes every year (It doesn't seem like it would be that difficult to simply re-activate or extend the existing activation codes automatically once the support contract has been renewed).
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-19-2014, 12:53 PM   #13
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 415

Rep: Reputation: 82
Not currently running a server, but Debian would be my choice.
 
Old 12-20-2014, 02:12 AM   #14
cowlitzron
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Washington state
Distribution: C4C Lubuntu ReSpin 16.04, JULInux 10 (Xubuntu Trusty)
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 24
Slackware for its reliability and staying with the traditional init with runit available in Slackbuilds
 
Old 12-21-2014, 04:28 PM   #15
schneidz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: boston, usa
Distribution: fc-15/ fc-20-live-usb/ aix
Posts: 5,150

Rep: Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887Reputation: 887
i wouldve voted fedora if that was available -- i guess centos is the closest facsimile.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 55 03-22-2012 05:13 PM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 76 03-02-2011 08:38 AM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 41 06-29-2010 03:11 PM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 62 02-14-2009 02:06 AM
Server Distribution of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 46 05-08-2008 10:28 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration