LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2014. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 3rd.


Notices


View Poll Results: File Manager of the Year
Caja 14 2.96%
Dolphin 131 27.70%
Double Commander 3 0.63%
emelFM2 2 0.42%
gentoo 1 0.21%
Gnome Commander 10 2.11%
Konqueror 17 3.59%
Krusader 24 5.07%
Midnight Commander 60 12.68%
muCommander 0 0%
Nautilus 50 10.57%
Nemo 28 5.92%
PCManFM 14 2.96%
ranger 11 2.33%
ROX-Filer 12 2.54%
SpaceFM 12 2.54%
Thunar 62 13.11%
vifm 4 0.85%
Worker 3 0.63%
Xfe 14 2.96%
FileRunner 1 0.21%
Voters: 473. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-17-2014, 09:11 AM   #16
philipgr
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Boksburg, South Africa
Distribution: Linux Mint 18.1
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Smile File manager of the year


For me it was a choice between Nemo and MuCommander. I use each one but for slightly different purposes. I chose Nemo for nostalgic reasons because in Linux Mint 17.1 Emblems are back and your folders can each have a different colour. Otherwise the functionality is more or less the same. MuCommander is easier if you need to move large amount of files. Also MuCommander allows you to overwrite files by ticking a checkbox whereas Nemo prompts you on each file.

Regards
Philip
 
Old 12-17-2014, 09:19 AM   #17
philipgr
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Boksburg, South Africa
Distribution: Linux Mint 18.1
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Smile Where is Bash?

Hi Jerry

I saw a query about Bash not being here. I do not believe Bash should be in this list because all the listed file managers are GUI based and Bash is a CLI.

Regards
Philip

Last edited by philipgr; 12-17-2014 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Spelling mistake in title
 
Old 12-17-2014, 09:25 AM   #18
Nikosis
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: In front of the monitor
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 322

Rep: Reputation: 59
Still Midnight Commander
 
Old 12-17-2014, 10:10 AM   #19
steeladept
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am with AstroGeek on this. I use the shell, and only shell. I have to - I don't even have a GUI installed. I will, therefore, not vote on this category and skew the results (however minor that would be). BTW: Bash is also my shell of choice for this.
 
Old 12-17-2014, 04:03 PM   #20
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US( + travel,) Earth&Mars (I wish,) END BORDER$!◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that work on freest-HW; has been KDE, CLI, Novena-SBC but open.. http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 4,888
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567Reputation: 1567
My DE==KDE so...
 
Old 12-17-2014, 06:56 PM   #21
dolphin_oracle
MX Linux
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Posts: 402

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
spaceFM

more tricks than you can shake a stick at.
 
Old 12-18-2014, 07:41 AM   #22
Ook
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Hell, Arizona (July - 118 degrees)
Distribution: Slackware 14.2 soon to be Slackware 15
Posts: 699

Rep: Reputation: 131Reputation: 131
In the beginning there was the Norton Commander (I still have my original 5 1/4 install floppies). Now there is the Midnight Commander. Man shall not live by bash alone, but by every command that shall proceed through the Midnight Commander.
 
Old 12-19-2014, 11:50 AM   #23
ozar
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 415

Rep: Reputation: 85
I generally use Rox-filer (my vote) with any standalone window manager, but use the default file manager with any full-blown DE.
 
Old 12-19-2014, 02:33 PM   #24
273
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680

Rep: Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373Reputation: 2373
To my mind the shell can be used to manage files but it is not a "file manager". My understanding is that a file manager is a program designed to allow one to view and manipulate files and directory structures in ways not possible in the shell.
For instance, historically, files on the the DOS/Netware machines of my youth could be manipulated through DOS -- heck, DOS means "Disk Operating System", however the file manager Xtree allowed one to visualise the layout of files and directories and manipulate them using different methods to the DOS shell. This, to me, defines a file manager -- it's an addition to the shell allowing file manipulation visually.

I had to vote Thunar as it does all I ask of it.
 
Old 12-19-2014, 07:46 PM   #25
Rooster68
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2014
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by astrogeek View Post
Where is bash?
"mc" was as close as I could find.
 
Old 12-20-2014, 01:01 AM   #26
cowlitzron
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Washington state
Distribution: Devuan Daedalus 5.0, C4C Ubuntu 22.04
Posts: 190

Rep: Reputation: 37
I voted for Dolphin because of its versatility and ability to search files and the content of documents, with Baloo or Strigi depending on the version of Dolphin. I often use Konqueror for file browsing when I am using Konqueror as a web browser.
 
Old 12-22-2014, 12:37 AM   #27
Widgeteye
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 17
Where's fileRunner? It's still around and I still use it.
 
Old 12-22-2014, 09:31 AM   #28
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083
fileRunner has been added.

--jeremy
 
Old 12-23-2014, 12:43 PM   #29
Cityscape
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Location: British Columbia
Distribution: Debian 8
Posts: 140

Rep: Reputation: 15
Nemo. It's a bunch like Nautilus but with a lot of improvements.

I also do like and use PCManFM and Caja though, depending on what computer or DE I'm using.
 
Old 12-26-2014, 01:22 PM   #30
sbolokanov
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Бдинъ, Бѫлгариѧ
Distribution: GNU/Linux
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 27
I found ranger pretty useful.

By the way, can anybody recommend good GUI file manager that does not need extra libraries, like Thunar > xfce stuff, Dolphin > KDE stuff etc.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
File Manager of the Year jeremy 2012 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 81 02-06-2013 10:01 AM
File Manager of the Year jeremy 2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 52 02-06-2011 12:05 AM
File Manager of the Year jeremy 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 49 02-22-2009 09:36 AM
File Manager of the Year jeremy 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 102 05-12-2006 09:12 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:55 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration