LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2014 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2014-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-113/)
-   -   File Manager of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2014-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-113/file-manager-of-the-year-4175528400/)

philipgr 12-17-2014 09:11 AM

File manager of the year
 
For me it was a choice between Nemo and MuCommander. I use each one but for slightly different purposes. I chose Nemo for nostalgic reasons because in Linux Mint 17.1 Emblems are back and your folders can each have a different colour. Otherwise the functionality is more or less the same. MuCommander is easier if you need to move large amount of files. Also MuCommander allows you to overwrite files by ticking a checkbox whereas Nemo prompts you on each file.

Regards
Philip

philipgr 12-17-2014 09:19 AM

Where is Bash?
 
Hi Jerry

I saw a query about Bash not being here. I do not believe Bash should be in this list because all the listed file managers are GUI based and Bash is a CLI.

Regards
Philip

Nikosis 12-17-2014 09:25 AM

Still Midnight Commander

steeladept 12-17-2014 10:10 AM

I am with AstroGeek on this. I use the shell, and only shell. I have to - I don't even have a GUI installed. I will, therefore, not vote on this category and skew the results (however minor that would be). BTW: Bash is also my shell of choice for this.

jamison20000e 12-17-2014 04:03 PM

My DE==KDE so... ;)

dolphin_oracle 12-17-2014 06:56 PM

spaceFM

more tricks than you can shake a stick at.

Ook 12-18-2014 07:41 AM

In the beginning there was the Norton Commander (I still have my original 5 1/4 install floppies). Now there is the Midnight Commander. Man shall not live by bash alone, but by every command that shall proceed through the Midnight Commander.

ozar 12-19-2014 11:50 AM

I generally use Rox-filer (my vote) with any standalone window manager, but use the default file manager with any full-blown DE.

273 12-19-2014 02:33 PM

To my mind the shell can be used to manage files but it is not a "file manager". My understanding is that a file manager is a program designed to allow one to view and manipulate files and directory structures in ways not possible in the shell.
For instance, historically, files on the the DOS/Netware machines of my youth could be manipulated through DOS -- heck, DOS means "Disk Operating System", however the file manager Xtree allowed one to visualise the layout of files and directories and manipulate them using different methods to the DOS shell. This, to me, defines a file manager -- it's an addition to the shell allowing file manipulation visually.

I had to vote Thunar as it does all I ask of it.

Rooster68 12-19-2014 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrogeek (Post 5285372)
Where is bash?

"mc" was as close as I could find.

cowlitzron 12-20-2014 01:01 AM

I voted for Dolphin because of its versatility and ability to search files and the content of documents, with Baloo or Strigi depending on the version of Dolphin. I often use Konqueror for file browsing when I am using Konqueror as a web browser.

Widgeteye 12-22-2014 12:37 AM

Where's fileRunner? It's still around and I still use it. :)

jeremy 12-22-2014 09:31 AM

fileRunner has been added.

--jeremy

Cityscape 12-23-2014 12:43 PM

Nemo. It's a bunch like Nautilus but with a lot of improvements.

I also do like and use PCManFM and Caja though, depending on what computer or DE I'm using.

sbolokanov 12-26-2014 01:22 PM

I found ranger pretty useful.

By the way, can anybody recommend good GUI file manager that does not need extra libraries, like Thunar > xfce stuff, Dolphin > KDE stuff etc.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 PM.