LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2013 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2013. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 4th.


Notices

View Poll Results: Text Editor of the Year
Emacs 52 7.84%
Geany 55 8.30%
gedit 69 10.41%
jEdit 1 0.15%
joe 4 0.60%
Kate 71 10.71%
KWrite 27 4.07%
leafpad 17 2.56%
medit 10 1.51%
Midnight Commander Editor 18 2.71%
Mousepad 8 1.21%
nano 60 9.05%
Nedit 4 0.60%
pico 5 0.75%
RedCar 0 0%
Scite 6 0.90%
Scribes 3 0.45%
vi 51 7.69%
vim 202 30.47%
Voters: 663. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2014, 07:02 PM   #106
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,208

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emerson View Post
How comes ed is not listed?
Because nobody in their right mind would use that
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-16-2014, 07:07 PM   #107
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: infinity; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US, Earth
Distribution: any UNIXish that works well on my cheapest with mostly KDE, Xfce or CLI but open ;-)
Posts: 1,104
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 259Reputation: 259Reputation: 259
^This from someone who adds an editor^ JK me too... till I learn more Bash.
 
Old 02-17-2014, 01:48 AM   #108
gotfw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 327

Rep: Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post
No offense but it seems like you are the one that wants the last word in


I'd like to point out Vim is a lot better than straight VI. I can tolerate VI but VIM is less temperamental and more user friendly.
And why make the effort to switch if vi(m) does everything I need in an editor, and I am familiar with it?

:wq
Yeah, it occured to me that I might be coming off that way as well and that this discussion might be belong in a different thread than a popularity poll, but since the poll was a done deal just left it here.

Anyhow, the reason I keep adding is not so much to say that vi/m or Emacs should be the one true editor, as I've tried to take care to point out that each has their place. The thing that gets me is the fanboism of some (not all) who have these really tightly held opinions w/o having actually evaluated alternatives.

vi is great! Seriously! It was a godsend in it's day because you were petty elite to even have such a tool available in the first place and not have to use a typewriter (or pay someone else to drive the typewriter for you). I went to school in the west. Had I gone to school in the east I might have been on an lisp machine and Emacs would have been the godsend.

The point being that the hours spent learning either of these new fangled tools paid off in spades compared to typewriters & the tediousness of correcting errors with white out or erasers. Especially since some prof's refused to accept or graded you down for papers that were not type perfectly.

So I used vi a lot!! And later vim (wasn't invented and even later not typically installed on commercial unices). I, like many others, used what was there in our early environments. Familiarity with one tool kept me from exploring alternatives. And that strategy made sense because I had a lot of time invested in vi before I even knew alternatives existed! Many, many years later I got around to giving Emacs a real test drive. Yeah, I had to get over the vi/m way and spend time grokking the emacs way. But now I'm making a more informed choice.

Which brings me back to the fanboism. Seems to have become a cultural/social phenomenon. Maybe it's too much information, too much overload, too much work, not enough time, etc. But it does strike me as rather odd that people will spend untold hours tweaking their wm to look cool but never objectively evaluate the options of such an essential tool as a text editor. In the windows world it's Office and Word. Could you imagine being saddled with that? But then ignorance may be bliss if that is all you know. Opening your eyes might just make you more productive though. And yeah, I know that it's not a perfect analogy, but hopefully you get my meaning.

And finally, "The Linux Way" was "The Unix Way" long before linux was even a dream in Linus' eye so it's kind of funny for me to read that. In any case, I think we mostly abandoned that precept. I mean, just look at modern DE. That being said, emacs and vi/m both do one thing very well: Edit text! It just so happens that editing text is essential across a large variety of tasks, and having a unified, transferrable set of keybindings makes for much greater editing efficiency. Emacs does this by doing a lot of text related activies from within Emacs itself via various modes. Vi/m accomplishes same in a different way: ubiquity of vi/m on *nix made it the grandfather to many more independent specialized tools that utilize vi keybindings, and/or can call vi/m as their editor, e.g. Mutt.

Just some thoughts.... Hopefull it's apparent that I am not really trying to prove one or the other is superior but rather that I wish I'd evaluated the alternatives and made a better informed choice a bit sooner in my career. Does that make sense?

Last edited by gotfw; 02-17-2014 at 01:53 AM.
 
Old 02-20-2014, 07:06 AM   #109
rscudder
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2014
Location: Pennsylvania, US
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I'm glad to see that at least 3 other people out there enjoy using JOE.
 
Old 02-20-2014, 09:30 AM   #110
harryhaller
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 428

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Back into the future:
Dennis Ritchie's choice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP1xVpMPn8M
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2014, 10:59 AM   #111
gotfw
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 327

Rep: Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryhaller View Post
Back into the future:
Dennis Ritchie's choice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP1xVpMPn8M
Ha! Thanks for that. I'd encountered that vid before but forgotten about acme. Pretty killer editor. Or maybe more appropriately; "user environment". Doesn't work for me though because it relies on so much mouse usage, and one of my main "requirements" is staying "homed" as much as possible. But if you prefer to drive your computer via mouse, I'd say Acme certainly deserves a look.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Text Editor of the Year jeremy 2011 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 82 03-05-2012 05:15 PM
Text Editor of the Year jeremy 2009 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 81 02-11-2010 12:59 AM
Text Editor of the Year jeremy 2008 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 93 05-09-2009 11:34 AM
Text Editor of the Year jeremy 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 64 02-22-2008 03:25 AM
Text Editor of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 225 08-26-2007 09:04 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration