LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2010 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2010-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-93/)
-   -   Window Manager of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2010-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-93/window-manager-of-the-year-855915/)

almatic 01-16-2011 03:58 AM

I vote for compiz. It has achieved so much in terms of promoting linux !
And it has become really amazingly stable.

anticapitalista 01-16-2011 04:43 AM

fluxbox though I also use icewm and wmii (used to use awesome, but didn't find it to be that awesome)

PetrusValidus 01-16-2011 09:07 PM

Openbox. The minimalist environment is great. I use it with GNOME and it runs beautifully.

afreitascs 01-16-2011 09:19 PM

KWin

rikijpn 01-17-2011 01:02 AM

Would it be possible to add "sawfish"? I'm rather surprised it's not already there, I thought it was a fairly popular window manager...

sunnydrake 01-17-2011 05:48 AM

metasity is fast and almost rock solid .. .but with lack of major innovations imho...

chal 01-17-2011 07:08 AM

I voted for metacity. I like plain vanilla metacity, without gnome. I also like nautilus as a file manager only (nautilus --no-desktop). Desktop Environments are unnecessary resource hogs IMO, unless you consider 3d and animated effects, or multiple and redundant means to access files necessary.

decodedthought 01-17-2011 07:32 AM

Xmonad :)

jeremy 01-17-2011 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rikijpn (Post 4226931)
Would it be possible to add "sawfish"? I'm rather surprised it's not already there, I thought it was a fairly popular window manager...

sawfish received only a single vote last year, so has been removed.

--jeremy

danos_p 01-18-2011 01:49 AM

FVWM was my first. Although I use different managers now, FVWM still has the most Linux look&feel for mee.

wafflesausage 01-18-2011 03:36 PM

Openbox. It does what any good window manager should do, and not much more. Low resource usage, reliable, easy to use, and easily configurable via it's straightforward and flexible xml configuration files. I can't imagine using any other box, except for maybe some tiling wm's which have some features that Openbox obviously lacks, however their interfaces are typically a little GNU screen-like and masochistic, unfortunately.

agreimann 01-18-2011 04:02 PM

I love configurability as a coder. Fluxbox.

MorderVomUbel 01-20-2011 01:46 AM

Awesome WM here =). I even use it on my high-powered gaming desktop machine, just because I can't seem to be content without a tiling wm. Was using KDE for a while...

Awesome is just plain awesome on my laptop, though. No need to use the mouse =)

I honestly haven't tried any tiling WM besides awesome, though... Downside to awesome is how the config file format keeps changing and causing awesome to totally fart... then I need to vimdiff the rc.lua before I can get my gui open =(

aterm 01-20-2011 05:19 AM

AwesomeWM for me. I use fluxbox when I first install a system, but always end up installing awesome; I can't keep myself away from a tiling WM for some reason...:rolleyes:

divyashree 01-20-2011 05:57 AM

Compiz is nice one.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.