Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back > Forums > 2010 Members Choice Awards
User Name
2010 Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2010 Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2010. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends on February 7th 8th.


View Poll Results: Virtualization Product of the Year
VirtualBox 268 59.03%
Xen 24 5.29%
VMware 85 18.72%
OpenVZ 3 0.66%
Parallels Workstation 5 1.10%
KVM 47 10.35%
Oracle VM 3 0.66%
QEMU 19 4.19%
Voters: 454. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2011, 06:43 AM   #16
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,501

Rep: Reputation: 219Reputation: 219Reputation: 219

Virtualbox - simply because I've used nothing else yet.
Old 01-17-2011, 11:14 PM   #17
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Dubai, UAE
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 40
Blog Entries: 13

Rep: Reputation: 15
Old 01-18-2011, 06:40 AM   #18
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2003
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
No doubt.. Virtual BOx
Old 01-18-2011, 08:17 AM   #19
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 880

Rep: Reputation: 332Reputation: 332Reputation: 332Reputation: 332
VirtualBox for 2010. I suspect I will answer differently for 2011 picks.
Old 01-18-2011, 11:42 AM   #20
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Same here, haven't tried other VMs but VirtualBox. For me, it just works™.
Old 01-18-2011, 12:00 PM   #21
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Cleveland
Distribution: Slackware, Fedora, RHEL (4,5), LFS 6.7, CentOS
Posts: 258

Rep: Reputation: 29
VMware - they are the 900lb Gorilla in the Enterprise Market. Which is better than MS
Old 01-20-2011, 01:37 AM   #22
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
You will only know what type of people are reading this forum, rather than knowing what people really use. I can see that there's really not a lot of people vouching for Xen, simply because that's not the type of product you will use on the desktop. Yet, Xen is used by the vast majority of providers. In fact, even Virtuozzo has more users, but it's not in the poll because it's just a jail, not a full virtualization env.

So, like many polls on the internet, we shouldn't care too much about the result, but care about people's comments more.

Personally, as a web host, we use extensively Xen (we have nearly 100 servers running it). It's a wonderful product which is rock solid. But the goal is really different from the one you will have running Virtualbox or VMWare. It's really server oriented, and it doesn't really have a good desktop interface.

On the desktop side, I think that Virtualbox is a winner. If you have the chance to have VT support on your computer, and if you run an NVidia board with decent OpenGL support, then running an emulated Windows will be extra fast, even when using 3D (virtualbox translates D3D calls into OpenGL). Also, the GUI is really simple and everyone should be able to use it.

Now, as for KVM, it's a product which is already going to be dead. Yes, it's better than Xen on the desktop, but Virtualbox is more easy to use. No, it's not a replacement for Xen on the server side, because it doesn't have the needed features (like PV, mounting a *partition* and not a full HDD, and so on).

There was a big big buzz about RedHat dropping support for Xen in the favor of KVM. But at the end, this was only silly marketing from silly people. No, RedHat isn't Linux. And if everyone was saying that KVM was in Linux and not Xen, since 2.6.37, this is wrong. In fact, this has always been wrong: Xen has always been slowly up-streaming to Now, in a couple of Linux releases, we'll see the back-end drivers for Xen being upstream too, and we will be able to say that Xen is fully supported. Now, everybody will wonder: how exactly RedHat will advertize about not willing to support Xen anymore, when it's included in the upstream kernel? What will be the stupid reason they will push? That it's too hard to package the userland tools as a RPM, when it's already provided by This makes no sense anymore, and they already look really stupid commercials marketing-oriented press-release that have zero understanding on the underlying technical involvements.

At the end of the day, everyone should be extremely happy that there's both KVM and Xen out there, and that they are COMPETING products. Overall, this is improving things, especially when one considers that Linus is only accepting one patch for one needed feature: at the end of the day, we got best of both worlds inside kernels from

Old 01-20-2011, 01:42 AM   #23
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: SusE 8.2
Posts: 5,863
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thomasgplhost -

Thank you for some very interesting - and insightful - comments.

Sincerely .. PSM
Old 01-20-2011, 01:48 AM   #24
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Colorado
Distribution: lubuntu, fedora, lightning Linux.
Posts: 180
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 36

VirtualBox is not the most versatile, yet it's easy to use.
Old 01-20-2011, 11:29 AM   #25
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: England
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Virtualbox. Seems much faster than KVM (for Windows at least)
Old 01-20-2011, 09:29 PM   #26
Registered: Dec 2010
Location: /home
Distribution: RL: Arch x64 VM: Debian
Posts: 460

Rep: Reputation: 38
I like VMware Workstation. It is amazing and easy to use.
Old 01-21-2011, 06:52 AM   #27
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: bbsr,orissa,India
Posts: 1,373

Rep: Reputation: 135Reputation: 135
Have any one used stackVM ?
Old 01-21-2011, 06:54 AM   #28
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: Planet Earth
Distribution: Unix & Linux Variants
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 20
I'm using Xen. :P
Old 01-21-2011, 08:17 AM   #29
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: debian and archlinux
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Would Proxmox fit into this category? I had problems choosing between KVM and OpenVZ when I voted, because I use both under the Proxmox umbrella.
Just thinking out loud...
Old 01-21-2011, 10:12 AM   #30
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 12,786

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570Reputation: 3570
Proxmox doesn't appear to be a Virtualization Product in and of itself, it simply implements other Virtualization products, so would not be eligible for this category.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Virtualization Product of the Year jeremy 2009 Members Choice Awards 60 02-10-2010 05:08 PM
Virtualization Product of the Year jeremy 2008 Members Choice Awards 39 10-19-2009 03:11 AM
Virtualization Product of the Year jeremy 2007 Members Choice Awards 44 02-28-2008 09:16 PM > Forums > 2010 Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration