Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Forums > 2007 Members Choice Awards
User Name
2007 Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st.


Poll: Window Manager of the Year
Poll Options
Window Manager of the Year

You must log in and have one post to vote in this poll. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
Results will be available after the polls close.

The nominees are:

Window Maker

  Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2008, 02:12 PM   #31
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD Arch
Posts: 2,024

Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326

I like fluxbox

Easily configurable through a text config file
Has all the basic functions needed to run a machine
Quick launching with a small footprint
Can be left sparse or made to display icons
Comes with some canned themes that make it functional or make your own
Doesn't comes with tons of bloat apps that you may never use or don't want
Old 01-19-2008, 10:06 PM   #32
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Northern California
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15

The more time I spend using Fluxbox, the more I like it!
Old 01-21-2008, 01:11 AM   #33
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Distribution: NetBSD, SlackwareLinux
Posts: 17
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Originally Posted by m0rg View Post
What about stumpwm?
Either they don't know, don't care or just plain forgot about.
Our pal Stumpwm!
Old 01-21-2008, 12:30 PM   #34
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware && freeBSD
Posts: 676

Rep: Reputation: 30
fluxbox every year :]
Old 01-22-2008, 06:04 AM   #35
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: /home/chris
Distribution: Zenwalk, Backtrack 2
Posts: 20

Rep: Reputation: 0
So far, Fluxbox is the best for me.
Old 01-31-2008, 08:01 AM   #36
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
I'd vote for stumpwm if I could :b
Old 02-01-2008, 05:30 AM   #37
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Distribution: Arch and sometimes still Puppy
Posts: 59

Rep: Reputation: 18
JWM of course!
Old 02-01-2008, 06:22 AM   #38
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 33
I voted for xfwm4 because mostly i use Xfce and I've never found a reason to change the window manager. I've also used Gnome with xfwm4 as the window manager and everything got a lot faster than with metacity. I'll use anything that's reasonably light and lets me shade a window with a mouse wheel scroll over as my gf doesn't like clicking noises when she's trying to sleep :-)
Old 02-01-2008, 06:35 AM   #39
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Bogotá, Colombia. South America
Distribution: ArchLinux / Source Mage GNU Linux (test branch) / openSUSE
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I voted Ion because I never thought I would change it anymore. But let's get real for a minute: what if not Xmonad?
Old 02-01-2008, 10:37 AM   #40
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 15
xmonad of course
Old 02-02-2008, 10:52 AM   #41
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 8
I am using FVWM. I have not find a window manager so flexible and powerful. For example:

* I can customise each desktop (i.e., each desktop has its own applications menu). This is one of the reasons, appart of its low resources consumption, I moved to FVWM.
* I can have multiple desktops, each with multiple pages. (One desktop is bigger than one screen)

In the xvinman voting chart, fvwm has a decent position (

I would like my vote to count for FVWM.
Old 02-02-2008, 01:09 PM   #42
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Madrid, Europe
Distribution: Linux Mint Elyssa
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
I've been using larswm for over a year and I'm happy, though I'm starting to miss having small cute icons in the desktop... I guess that's how someone can get tired of minimalistic-tiling wm. Cheers

Last edited by fresno; 02-02-2008 at 01:21 PM.
Old 02-02-2008, 10:43 PM   #43
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Distribution: Mandriva 2010.1
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: 15
I need my Afterstep please.
Old 02-11-2008, 08:46 AM   #44
Count Zero
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Debian wheezy
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 15
Fluxbox. It's the best thing since sliced bread. No, wait. It's far better than sliced bread. It's the greatest thing that ever happened. There, it's said.
Old 02-15-2008, 03:09 AM   #45
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2007
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu Studio 9.10
Posts: 29

Rep: Reputation: 15
I like IceWM. On lower-end systems, it runs great for me. Fluxbox is okay, but I'm more familiar with IceWm.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Window Manager of the Year jeremy 2006 Members Choice Awards 108 06-26-2007 04:43 PM
Window Manager of the Year jeremy 2005 Members Choice Awards 112 05-17-2006 02:16 AM > Forums > 2007 Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration