2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
View Poll Results: Server Distribution of the Year
|
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
|
  
|
80 |
10.40% |
CentOS
|
  
|
99 |
12.87% |
Ubuntu LTS
|
  
|
88 |
11.44% |
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server
|
  
|
41 |
5.33% |
Gentoo
|
  
|
46 |
5.98% |
Slackware
|
  
|
174 |
22.63% |
Debian
|
  
|
233 |
30.30% |
LFS
|
  
|
8 |
1.04% |
 |
|
12-31-2007, 02:28 PM
|
#1
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,620
|
Server Distribution of the Year
The Distribution of the Year poll has been broken into three polls this year (Server, Desktop and Live).
--jeremy
|
|
|
12-31-2007, 07:15 PM
|
#2
|
ReliaFree Maintainer
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Distribution: Slackware 14.2
Posts: 2,815
|
One question, is the 2006 in the following a holdover from last year, i.e. should it be 2007?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy
2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards. You can now vote for your favorite products of 2006.
|
|
|
|
12-31-2007, 11:56 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2006
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 20
Rep:
|
What about OpenSolaris?
|
|
|
01-01-2008, 02:07 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 63
Rep:
|
Not Linux but i agree
|
|
|
01-01-2008, 08:29 AM
|
#5
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,620
Original Poster
|
* Updated the year.
* OpenSolaris is not a Linux distribution.
--jeremy
|
|
|
01-01-2008, 02:00 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 406
Rep:
|
missed: OpenSolaris + FreeBSD + NetBSD + OpenBSD + Arch Linux + BusyBox (for embedded)
Last edited by vermaden; 01-01-2008 at 02:02 PM.
|
|
|
01-01-2008, 04:20 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 63
Rep:
|
As stated above solaris is not a Linux distribution and neither are any bsd's.
|
|
|
01-01-2008, 05:38 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 406
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jumico
As stated above solaris is not a Linux distribution and neither are any bsd's.
|
"Server Distribution of the Year" does not mean "Linux Server Distribution of the Year"
Even better argument is that BSD's and Solaris a re in many ways a lot more better suited for Server work.
|
|
|
01-02-2008, 10:26 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Jersey
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 38
Rep:
|
No Archlinux? 
|
|
|
01-02-2008, 10:45 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 102
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vermaden
"Server Distribution of the Year" does not mean "Linux Server Distribution of the Year"
|
Unless of course it's on linuxquestions.org 
|
|
|
01-02-2008, 12:05 PM
|
#11
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,620
Original Poster
|
Arch is in the desktop poll.
--jeremy
|
|
|
01-02-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: pl_PL.lodz
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 406
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GamerX
Unless of course it's on linuxquestions.org 
|
Along with bsdquestions.org 
|
|
|
01-02-2008, 08:31 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935
Rep: 
|
I think it's a legitimate point. There are OpenSolaris and *BSD subforums here.
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 12:24 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04
Posts: 315
Rep:
|
i dont see clark connect its a linux distro and very popular
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 08:04 AM
|
#15
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
It may be a bit mis-categorized, but I would consider IPCop a server distribution (sort of...)
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|