Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back > Forums > 2007 Members Choice Awards
User Name
2007 Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st.


View Poll Results: Live Distribution of the Year
KNOPPIX 224 22.88%
PCLinuxOS 103 10.52%
Sabayon 36 3.68%
Damn Small 71 7.25%
Puppy 66 6.74%
Elive 12 1.23%
SLAX 88 8.99%
Fedora Live 35 3.58%
Ubuntu Live 220 22.47%
Mandriva One 44 4.49%
Gentoo Live 13 1.33%
SimplyMEPIS 33 3.37%
sidux 22 2.25%
Wolvix 9 0.92%
dyne:bolic 3 0.31%
Voters: 979. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 01-08-2008, 09:33 AM   #31
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
where is kanotix

i am missing Kanotix?!

or do only stable releases count???
Old 01-09-2008, 11:40 AM   #32
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 1,193
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 177Reputation: 177
If there where Zenwalk i would voted to it, since it's based on Slax i voted for Tomas M.'s distro instead - that's power!
All try

It can now both use live modules and blend them in (if on rw media) for consecutive boots...
I'm all pro-SLAX now!
Old 01-09-2008, 12:00 PM   #33
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 1,193
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 177Reputation: 177
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by cardinals_fan View Post
Zenwalk Live is the best live cd, bar none. Please add it.
I second to that
Old 01-15-2008, 01:30 AM   #34
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Zug, Switzerland
Distribution: Ark Linux
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Originally Posted by jeremy View Post
The Distribution of the Year poll has been broken into three polls this year (Server, Desktop and Live).

Ark Linux Live
Old 01-15-2008, 02:52 AM   #35
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: South Africa
Distribution: GoboLinux
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
... i wish i could vote for GoboLinux
Old 01-15-2008, 05:39 AM   #36
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2007
Location: East Texas Piney Woods
Distribution: Xubuntu, XFCE
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Can't vote. My choice - Parsix - isn't there. You need an 'Other' category.
Old 01-15-2008, 05:47 AM   #37
Tons of Fun
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida
Distribution: Debian Wheezy / BackTrack 5/ Linux Mint 17
Posts: 379

Rep: Reputation: 37
I am a Debian user, but for Live CD's, it's strictly BackTrack.
Old 01-15-2008, 08:19 AM   #38
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2007
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Distribution: Open Suse 10 + Ubuntu 7
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
ubuntu or Helix

For desktop & live, the best experience I have ever had has been with unbuntu. Open Suse 10 worked fine on an old Gateway laptop, but it never seemed to be able to handle wireless devices. Ubuntu works flawlessly, provided you have Fawn.

My company uses the Helix/Knoppix distro for work purposes. It has lots of excellent security apps which makes network and desktop analysis easy.

For personal usage, I'd have to recommend ubuntu, though. It is the most flawless I have used to date.
Old 01-15-2008, 09:12 AM   #39
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 1,193
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 177Reputation: 177
Arrow Zenwalk is Slackware too

Originally Posted by Tons of Fun View Post
I am a Debian user, but for Live CD's, it's strictly BackTrack.
Backtrack is based on slax.
slax is based on linux-live scripts and Slackware
both of them the work of the excellent Thomas Matjicek.
Thomas made Slackware live

So I would recommend SLAX, but...

Zenwalk, despite being also based on SLAX and Slackware has a far better and better finished Howto for Live-linux expansion and customisation.

So, since Linux is for freedom and customisation IMHO, i woted for Zenwalk so this excellent distro could get the exposure it deserves.

Slax - live --> 250MB
Zenwalk - live --> 450MB
BackTrack2 - live --> 700MB

Last edited by SCerovec; 01-15-2008 at 09:16 AM. Reason: typos - my keyboard bad :(
Old 01-15-2008, 09:29 AM   #40
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Distribution: Manjaro Linux, Linux Mint, Semplix
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 15
I voted Ubuntu live, but I really would have prefered Linux Mint. Mepis Anti X is also a very good one as is Wolvix.
Old 01-15-2008, 11:28 AM   #41
Registered: Sep 2007
Distribution: fedora (x86, alpha, sparc, ppc) debian (x86, x64, mips, hp-pa, ppc) suse (x64) slackware (x86, ppc)
Posts: 59

Rep: Reputation: 18
Well, I voted fedora because I can make my own live CD's
without any giant pain, but I like Knoppix, DSL, Puppy, and since I run Solaris too, Belenix as well
Old 01-15-2008, 11:43 AM   #42
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
First Live CD's

Originally Posted by RobertP View Post
quoting Wikipedia:

KNOPPIX came out a few months before MEPIS according to
And didn't Morphix come out shortly before Knoppix? I suppose I could be wrong, though.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:18 PM   #43
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Best LiveCD(s)

This is kind of a broad category. It really depends on what you, personally, use live cd's for. Some use them as a temporary desktop. Some use them for hardware/alternate OS analysis. Some use them for security auditing, or even as a temporary multimedia suite.
This makes it kind of tough to say which distro is simply the best, when they may not even be aiming to do the same thing.

That said, the 2 main reasons I would use a live cd is for exposure to a certain distro (or just linux in general), usually for others; or as a security auditing/computer diagnostic tool.
My choice for the first, would have to be Ubuntu. While I've been a long-time fan of Knoppix, and was skeptical of Ubuntu at first, Ubuntu has proven to be just as useful. Although I was afraid Ubuntu (live cd) would be too "noob" friendly, and restrict what I wanted to do as a power user, I've found that I can still access everything I want with ease. The primary reason I choose it over others, like Knoppix, is it's rapid adoption and support of hardware. Of all the live cd's I've used, Ubuntu (largely because of it's active development team) recognizes and runs on the widest and most inclusive array of hardware. (openSUSE 10 Live, is one of the closest recent alternatives to Ubuntu, but is still lacking in a few minor areas.)
My choice for a security/recovery distro is BackTrack. I used to use Knoppix STD, and PHLAK. The reason I used both, was that each had some tools that the other did not have. The (at least recent) BackTrack distro, I have everything I could want, right at my fingertips, in very well-organized menu. BackTrack also seems to have better hardware support than a lot of the other security distros I've used.

In the end, I voted for Ubuntu, because it does what I think live cd's are most used for. And because of it's ease-of-use and great stability and hardware support, Ubuntu has made one of the largest impacts of exposing users of other operating systems to the wonderful world of Linux. I think Ubuntu has come the closest to being able to replace the average Windows or Mac OS user's operating system.

Thanks, Linus, for making all of this possible. :)
Old 01-15-2008, 12:22 PM   #44
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,362
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548Reputation: 3548
+1 for HELIX. I've found out the hard way certain commercial forensic boot CD's and floppies suck major, and that is an understatement. In a lot of cases forensic data acquisition would have been near impossible for me without this Live CD in my toolkit.
Old 01-15-2008, 12:55 PM   #45
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: The birthplace of the Industrial Revolution
Distribution: Puppy, Suse, Mepis, Ubuntu, DSL, Tinycore, Microcore, Slitaz(almost)
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 1
As an ancient newbie, I tried a few versions of linux and of those I tried I favour 'puppy' for its simplicity, 'susie' for its presentation and add ons, however I still cannot get my new 'samsung' laser to work with any distro I have tried. The manufacture states and supplies a linux driver for it on the install c.d., but what version of linux? they do not state, could it be 'ninja' linux? lol. I will not give up trying linux, its very quick, precise, with no memory/system slowing parasites of the type you get with windows, my ancient dx4/100 runs faster in 'puppy' than my 2.4 gig runs in xp. I do find it rather strange that m.s. are delving into linux, will they do another apple/Jobes and steal it then apply their barbed wire ring fence around it with another million patents? then challenge the man who originaly wrote the code to get a billion dollar lawyer to sue them, if he could ever afford it. Anyway a happy new year and many happy hours proving linux does work to you all, kind regards, Bob (delta bravo).


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Distribution of the Year jeremy 2006 Members Choice Awards 537 08-27-2007 01:17 PM
Live Distribution of the Year jeremy 2006 Members Choice Awards 164 04-16-2007 11:04 AM > Forums > 2007 Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration