LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2007. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends February 21st.

Notices


View Poll Results: IDE/Web Development Editor of the Year
Quanta 105 15.81%
Bluefish 57 8.58%
Eclipse 148 22.29%
Kdevelop 79 11.90%
Nvu 45 6.78%
Ginf 1 0.15%
Screem 2 0.30%
SeaMonkey Composer 14 2.11%
Zend Studio 7 1.05%
Komodo 9 1.36%
Anjuta 16 2.41%
Emacs 43 6.48%
Netbeans 82 12.35%
MonoDevelop 7 1.05%
Kylix 3 0.45%
eric3 4 0.60%
Geany 42 6.33%
Voters: 664. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2008, 08:03 PM   #46
oskar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Austria
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.10
Posts: 1,142

Rep: Reputation: 49

I won't vote. I've always used bluefish, but it's pretty annoying recently. The default-browser button won't open the browser. There is a cancel, ok, and apply button in the settings, and "ok" does the same as "cancel", and it can't spell-check special letters like ö and ä.
I might switch to Screem, but I'm not sold on it either.
 
Old 02-01-2008, 09:56 AM   #47
scubanator87
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Posts: 39

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Lightbulb Code::Blocks

What else can i say?
 
Old 02-01-2008, 10:05 AM   #48
code933k
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Bogotá, Colombia. South America
Distribution: ArchLinux / Source Mage GNU Linux (test branch) / openSUSE
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Exclamation

Where's my VIM This is far enough Sr.
 
Old 02-01-2008, 03:20 PM   #49
jonnymccullagh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Kubuntu
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
Aptana ?
Has many flaws but it makes my life easier for some things. Could be one for the future.
 
Old 02-02-2008, 11:59 AM   #50
short circut
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Distribution: Fedora Core, and Gentoo eventually, but i hate (XKEU)buntu
Posts: 48

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by scubanator87 View Post
Code::Blocks What else can i say?

I have to agree. I have suggested it this year and last year and people seem to ignore it. Check it out people. It is a no crap ide that is still very very usable when compared to other ide's
 
Old 02-02-2008, 12:34 PM   #51
code933k
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Bogotá, Colombia. South America
Distribution: ArchLinux / Source Mage GNU Linux (test branch) / openSUSE
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega Man X View Post
Every year we have to go through this: People asking to add vi(m) as an IDE. Vim is a text editor, not an IDE. If we had a pool for the "Best hammer of the year", with choices like:

- Claw hammer;
- Geologist's hammer;
- Ball-peen hammer;
- Sledgehammer.

there would always be somebody saying that they do all their hammering needs with a screwdriver. No doubt you can do that, but it is still NOT a hammer...
Popular assertions aren't necessarily correct assertions as well. If you count on tabs, command completion, text completion, "multi-window", spell correction, integrable and integrated FTP client, and integrated aliases/command line for launching a browser (or just refreshing a browser with the current page opened, using a light HTTP server, etc.) in a very stable and light editor is what I call a working IDE.

Confusing the WIMP model with an IDE is an entire ontological problem for my understanding.

If I do use VIM for anything is because of the easy, coding speed, mental clarity and pleasure I obtain from an excel editor. Now, If you chose anything for your own pleasure, you are on your right but it's your problem breaking your fingers with a mouse and menus, learning to use a peculiar IDE which is hiding the important parts from you or limiting your machine resources to few tasks.
 
Old 02-02-2008, 12:38 PM   #52
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Quote:
I have to agree. I have suggested it this year and last year and people seem to ignore it. Check it out people. It is a no crap ide that is still very very usable when compared to other ide's
Code::Blocks is dead (abandoned in 2005) so I don't see how it could be the application of 2007. The only reason it is still around is because the Ubuntu folks have decided to put some effort in it.
 
Old 02-02-2008, 12:49 PM   #53
peart
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 31

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay73 View Post
Code::Blocks is dead (abandoned in 2005) so I don't see how it could be the application of 2007. The only reason it is still around is because the Ubuntu folks have decided to put some effort in it.
Code::Blocks has nightly builds every night. It's far from dead.
 
Old 02-03-2008, 02:51 AM   #54
rakekniven
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
kylix is dead

Borland (now CodeGear) is not working on kylix anymore for some years now.
 
Old 02-04-2008, 05:45 AM   #55
pbhj
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware 12; Ubuntu 7.10
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 32
KompoZer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vadi.ubuntu View Post
I'd like to see Kompozer added to the list..
Kompozer should be on the list IMHO too. Even better it should be finished! Shame I can't code!!

[Yes, I do contribute to other projects with non-coding, eg testing, feature suggestions, bug triage and reporting]
 
Old 02-16-2008, 03:59 PM   #56
diilbert
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: North of the Border
Distribution: Gentoo & Debian
Posts: 155

Rep: Reputation: 30
The only GUI Developer studio I have used for Linux is MinGW Studio (which is not listed and seems to be dead)
 
Old 02-17-2008, 08:16 PM   #57
crackm0nk3y
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
gedit anyone ?

gedit plz. its plugins make it extremely capable.

Last edited by crackm0nk3y; 02-17-2008 at 08:17 PM.
 
Old 02-18-2008, 05:25 PM   #58
sotn3m
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
eric4? I suppose it was available last year too...
 
Old 02-20-2008, 11:12 PM   #59
jasohl
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Distribution: Gentoo, LinuxMint, Arch Linux
Posts: 99

Rep: Reputation: 18
I've been using Quanta for web disign. I like it pretty good.
 
Old 03-04-2008, 11:37 AM   #60
schneidz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: boston, usa
Distribution: fedora-35
Posts: 5,313

Rep: Reputation: 918Reputation: 918Reputation: 918Reputation: 918Reputation: 918Reputation: 918Reputation: 918Reputation: 918
i wish there was a option for gedit + gcc
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Web Development Editor of the Year jeremy 2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 42 06-18-2007 08:04 PM
Web Development Editor of the Year jeremy 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 51 03-01-2006 06:24 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2007 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration