LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   2006 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2006-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-76/)
-   -   Live Distribution of the Year (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/2006-linuxquestions-org-members-choice-awards-76/live-distribution-of-the-year-514938/)

jeremy 01-01-2007 07:00 PM

I've changed the title of the poll to simply Live Distribution of the Year, as it does more accurately reflect the nature of the poll.

--jeremy

fair_is_fair 01-01-2007 07:07 PM

I just started playing around with Sabayon and it is amazing.

hbush 01-01-2007 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatrickNew
Not really. Yes, we certainly do have a lot more options available now, but almost everything available as a bootable usb or DVD is also available as a CD.

These varieties are not equal. DVD or USB-Flash have much bigger amount of memory available (currently 4-8 Gb on DVD, 1-8 Gb on USB Flash) and therefore can offer much more feature-rich distros than old good ancient CD's.

Quote:

CDs provide a level of portability that the others just can't.
Generally I was not talking about portability things at all. What I mentioned was that while historically Live CD's were the first ones of this kind of distros, now IMHO it is not necessary anymore to narrow Live distro category to just LiveCD.

What's wrong with simply calling them "Live distros" meaning that they are ready to work without any additional installation process? Being physically on CD is not essential for this classification :)

hbush 01-01-2007 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeremy
I've changed the title of the poll to simply Live Distribution of the Year, as it does more accurately reflect the nature of the poll.

Great! I was just writing about that, but now it's OK already :)

PatrickNew 01-01-2007 07:27 PM

True, I just meant that I haven't actually seen any live Distro *not* available in CD format. While it may no longer be the best term, I don't think "LiveCD" in necessary obsolete.

--Edit--
Although, upon further review :-), I think the name change was more appropriate. Oh well, 20/20 hindsight.

google01103 01-01-2007 08:05 PM

I think Gparted LiveCd hands down

JLP 01-01-2007 08:11 PM

Mandriva One 2007
 
Hard to say. I like Kubuntu a lot, but I'd go for Mandriva One 2007. More stuff worked out of the box, has better translation into Slovenian language and Mandriva is the first Live distribution where XGL and 3D desktop worked out of the box. Not to mention a new version of Mandriva, that is available on USB key.

macemoneta 01-01-2007 10:41 PM

Fedora's official LiveCD is great, but not an option. The unofficial (Fedora Unity) LiveDVD is even better.

dont_stop_me 01-02-2007 02:20 AM

I like SLAX because I can shape it the way I want and I have all the packages I want.

prozac 01-02-2007 03:06 AM

i voted for knoppix since its what i have been using mostly. but gentoo is better since all my seniors prefer it and gentoo (not the live one) i think is the coolest OS once you configure and install it right. i have heard you can two-fold your machine performance if you configure gentoo right while u install. i dunno the facts since i have never installed one, but i am as soon as i get my hands on a new machine. heh.

diilbert 01-02-2007 05:31 AM

Everyone has a live cd these days ;) But I give props to Knoppix since it has gotten me out of more then one Jam.

strangevarius 01-02-2007 07:13 AM

i vote for knoppix

el amigo* 01-02-2007 07:27 AM

I voted for Puppy, as it is very light, & still quite complete, however, for testing & diagnosticing purposes (other people's PC), I also use a lot SimplyMepis & PCLinuxOS...

sebelk 01-02-2007 07:46 AM

MandrivaMove ???
 
:confused:
MandrivaMove doesn't exist no more.

Now it's Mandriva ONE.

Greets.

Zayar Win 01-02-2007 07:48 AM

I use powerful live CD "Dyne:Bolic".


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.