Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back > Forums > > 2005 Members Choice Awards
User Name
2005 Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.


View Poll Results: Window Manager of the Year
Window Maker 78 6.65%
Fluxbox 318 27.11%
Enlightenment 176 15.00%
KWin 212 18.07%
sawfish 9 0.77%
MetaCity 98 8.35%
IceWM 92 7.84%
Blackbox 36 3.07%
AfterStep 7 0.60%
Openbox 26 2.22%
fvwm2 33 2.81%
Ratpoison 6 0.51%
Ion 16 1.36%
xfwm4 66 5.63%
Voters: 1173. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2006, 12:17 PM   #46
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: FreeBSD Arch
Posts: 1,873

Rep: Reputation: 253Reputation: 253Reputation: 253

My 2 cents.

I prefure Fluxbox. I have Flux and FreeBSD doing duty on a PII 350. It will even play streaming video with Mplayer and RealPlay over the net. Also have it on PIII's and P4's.

KDE is nice but a little heavy for me.

IceWM is ok.

FVWM is ok.

Last edited by teckk; 02-05-2006 at 12:20 PM.
Old 02-05-2006, 06:36 PM   #47
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Arch, Debian and FreeBSD
Posts: 243

Rep: Reputation: 30
Originally Posted by lydgate
Can anyone who has experience with OpenBox point out why they choose Flux, Blackbox, or e16 over it?
I used openbox for about a month or more. But I dropped it because it's too slow. (I started using ion3, then ratpoison and now icewm instead)

Otherwhise I think it's greater looking... and much cleaner then fluxbox.

On the other side... it's quite a hack to get obpager to start on startup.
Old 02-06-2006, 12:42 PM   #48
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Xubuntu 12.04 LTS
Posts: 154

Rep: Reputation: 16
Definitely Xfce's xfwm4
Old 02-09-2006, 08:12 PM   #49
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Slackware 10.4 Arch 0.7.2
Posts: 9

Rep: Reputation: 0
hey hey hey! you guys forgot the best wm out there! TWM!!!!! i mean come on!!! its just sexy!....guess i'll have to go with blackbox, isn't anyone else here minimalist?
Old 02-13-2006, 02:30 PM   #50
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: FreeBSD 6.0, Ubuntu as backup
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Ion2 is the best I've tried.
Old 02-15-2006, 08:59 AM   #51
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 374

Rep: Reputation: 30
fluxbox rules supreme.

Old 02-15-2006, 12:57 PM   #52
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,014

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
IceWM! Fluxbox gave me problems the task bar always cutting off the names of my programs.
Old 02-15-2006, 06:25 PM   #53
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Watching it snow in bush Alaska
Distribution: *ubuntu, Smoothwall, WinXP Pro
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 15
Tried others but I always come back to fluxbox.
Old 02-15-2006, 08:53 PM   #54
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Spain
Distribution: Debian Sid, OpenSUSE 42.3
Posts: 1,193

Rep: Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631Reputation: 631
I like both: fluxbox and enlightenment, but if I had to make a choice, then I'd choose enlightenment.
Old 02-16-2006, 02:44 AM   #55
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
MetaCity. It does a great job on my SUSE.
Old 02-16-2006, 06:04 AM   #56
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: Fedora 7
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
Openbox + Cygwin/X: my saviour when I'm at work where I have to use windoze.
Metacity: one of the best window managers ever. It does it's job, nothing less and nothing more.
Enlightenment: it's cool.

This year my vote goes to Openbox

Last edited by d0g; 02-16-2006 at 06:06 AM.
Old 02-16-2006, 12:25 PM   #57
joe f.
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Distribution: Slackware & Arch (at the moment)
Posts: 15

Rep: Reputation: 1
I voted Fluxbox and spend the most time there, but E17 is impressive. I'm going to build a more powerful machine soon, and if E17 keeps going the way it is I could be Enlightened in 2006.
Old 02-16-2006, 03:58 PM   #58
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Zinzinnati, OH
Distribution: RH, FC 1-6, F 7-21, Debian, LinuxPPC, Knoppix, Ubuntu, Yellow Dog
Posts: 176

Rep: Reputation: 31
Wow! There seems to be a few WMs I didn't even know they existed. Have to try out a few in the next few months.
Old 02-16-2006, 06:04 PM   #59
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Romania
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 171
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 31
Cool OpenBox3 for me

I've used KDE, Gnome, Fluxbox, FVWM, E17 and OpenBox3. I got the tip on OB3 from people on #gentoo, thought I should give it a try and realised people were not lieing! I don't know why some say OpenBox is slower than Fluxbox?! Is that OB2? OB3 is faster for me.
KDE seemed to bloated! Bad antialiasing! Bad fonts! Heavy on the resources! Not so smart WM! Gnome seemed OK... still a bit heavy. Fluxbox is nothing but a great WM! FVWM I don't know what to say about! E17 is ... unusual? OpenBox is ... "standards compliant"
Anyway my prefered window manager is OpenBox3 now and forever I hope!
Old 02-17-2006, 10:19 AM   #60
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Debian/unstable
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
fluxbox !!!


members choice awards

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off > Forums > > 2005 Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration