2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
East or West.. Emacs is the best.. I simply can't live without it.
It's the text editor of the century. Nothing cannn replace things like gcc and so is emacs..
I use vi for short simple tasks, edits and scripts. However, for larger tasks, I prefer a GUI text editor. Given that I have only worked with OS for about a year and in particular Red Hat distributions, I have gotten use to Kedit as a GUI based text editor.
nano on all my other consoles except pico on redhat 9 (yuck) Still want a version of nano that will work on my Solaris 10 boxes. Working in vi just bites.
I had to pick vim/vi. I love the color highlighted syntax for certain languages. I have to admit, though, that emacs is pretty solid and pico/nano is very simple to use, but once you learn vim it is worth it.
first of all-pico and nano are the same things
when i was a newbie no one ever introduced me to vi(m), i always used nano
when i try to use it now-it just seems less productive
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.