LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.

Notices


View Poll Results: File Manager of the Year
Nautilus 217 15.93%
Konqueror 698 51.25%
Midnight Commander 159 11.67%
KFM 5 0.37%
Xplore 1 0.07%
Xfe 44 3.23%
ROX-Filer 78 5.73%
Krusader 97 7.12%
gentoo 21 1.54%
Worker 6 0.44%
EmelFM/EmelFM2 21 1.54%
Xandros File Manager 15 1.10%
Voters: 1362. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2006, 11:46 PM   #31
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46

Konqueror, by far.
 
Old 01-31-2006, 12:27 AM   #32
arunvk
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora 29
Posts: 197

Rep: Reputation: 30
its nautils for me.
 
Old 01-31-2006, 07:18 AM   #33
i_m_meen
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Thunar should of been there too. If not, this year it surely will
 
Old 01-31-2006, 08:48 AM   #34
progster
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 76

Rep: Reputation: 15
rox-filer ... really a great tool, it's just allows me to do things quicker then in other file managers.
 
Old 01-31-2006, 08:51 AM   #35
NoWindowsInMyHome
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 58

Rep: Reputation: 15
nautilus for me because it does what its supposed to do and doesn't bother with what it shouldn't be concerned with. for that reason, its fast and reliable.
 
Old 01-31-2006, 09:24 AM   #36
gunnix
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Arch, Debian and FreeBSD
Posts: 243

Rep: Reputation: 30
I like to use Emelfm-elm but I'm no way near a fan of emelfm2.

But I probably use bash with cd,cp,mv, etc more.
 
Old 01-31-2006, 11:07 PM   #37
cddesjar
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Maine/Minnesota/Alberta
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 125

Rep: Reputation: 15
tough call between worker and emelfm...but worker is prettier and it can do more stuff...though emelfm has a built in terminal...well i'm going to vote for worker!
 
Old 02-01-2006, 06:04 AM   #38
kesara
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Distribution: Arch Linux, Gentoo Linux, Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 116

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxy123
xffm from svn is a great file manager. I love it. It is light and has a number of very useful plugins.
Yeah! xffm is great...
 
Old 02-01-2006, 06:38 AM   #39
LordSurvivoR
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Serbia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
cp cd mv ls ln rm...
From those above: twin panel definitely - MC &/or Krusader.

Daniel.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 07:06 AM   #40
arunvk
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora 29
Posts: 197

Rep: Reputation: 30
i want to try out konqueror but i could not associate it with the folders. i use gnome. even after changed the open with properties, it stills opens the folders in nautils.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 08:45 AM   #41
kule
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 87

Rep: Reputation: 16
Thumbs up

in X: krusader
in console: mc

Voted for krusader because it's always improving.

Last edited by kule; 02-01-2006 at 08:46 AM.
 
Old 02-01-2006, 12:46 PM   #42
KainX
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Louisville, KY Metro Area
Distribution: cAos
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
It's a shame you failed to include either of the two FM's I actually find useful: endeavour2 and evidence
 
Old 02-01-2006, 12:53 PM   #43
cormack
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.10, ubuntu 8.04.2 server
Posts: 156

Rep: Reputation: 30
Konqueror, although i havnt used all of the ones in the list, from what i have used Konqueror has been the most efficient and looks the best after some themes. it has so many built in features and 3.5 is reli good, cant fault it yet
 
Old 02-01-2006, 01:38 PM   #44
Widgeteye
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 17
Thumbs down Missed the best one

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy
A new poll last year, which ended up being a close race.

--jeremy
You missed the best file manager.

File Runner


I give the poll one of these...
 
Old 02-01-2006, 02:06 PM   #45
mtb
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Italy
Distribution: Linux Mint 17 Xfce
Posts: 295

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by cddesjar
tough call between worker and emelfm...but worker is prettier and it can do more stuff...though emelfm has a built in terminal...well i'm going to vote for worker!
I choose worker too.

I use it as my main file manager from 3 years now, it offers a good number of great features like the quite new avfs file system ( based on extfs from mc ) for archive/ftp support, easy and powerful configuration and the fact that it can be expanded very very much.

Buttons with still great keyboard usage make it almost fit all my needs.

Between the others i quite like also Emelfm series and also the "abandoned" File Runner i have used a lot of time ago.
 
  


Reply

Tags
members choice awards



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration