LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

Notices


View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
Quanta 348 50.88%
Bluefish 165 24.12%
Ginf 0 0%
Screem 32 4.68%
Nvu 94 13.74%
Mozilla Composer 45 6.58%
Voters: 684. You may not vote on this poll

 
  Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2005, 11:17 PM   #61
BittaBrotha
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
Distribution: Debian Sid, SourceMage 0.9.5, & To be Continued on a TP
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 31

I would have to go with Bluefish & Mozilla Composer
 
Old 01-19-2005, 11:46 AM   #62
initialdrifteg6
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: France, Kentucky
Distribution: debian
Posts: 173

Rep: Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally posted by X Predator X
kate in Linux, notepad in windows

thats how we 'elite' teenagers do it nowadays
elite teenagers? =)~ we elite old folks wrote kate and notepad for you l33t kids
 
Old 01-20-2005, 06:59 AM   #63
JonEberger
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Fedora Core 4
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quanta is super handy and overall got my vote. Otherwise for barebones stuff I use Emacs. I can write html, compile my LaTeX stuff, and it even recognizes the syntax from stuff like MATLAB.
 
Old 01-26-2005, 06:07 AM   #64
lewus
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Redhat
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: 0
Bluefish
 
Old 02-01-2005, 03:41 AM   #65
mishu_b
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 15
mozilla composer
 
Old 02-01-2005, 04:28 AM   #66
soob
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: A country town, Australia
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 72

Rep: Reputation: 15
ark! Where's vi on the poll?
 
Old 02-01-2005, 10:18 AM   #67
einnor
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Distribution: Mandrake
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta..!! the best!!

the second maybe screem..
 
Old 02-01-2005, 12:05 PM   #68
GOAway
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta+

Quanta+ is my choice for web developing.
 
Old 02-01-2005, 12:34 PM   #69
cybernightlife
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Distribution: Slackware 10.0, Fedora Core 2
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
It's a tie...

IMO, my preferred Web page editor is Bluefish, as I have been using that editor to maintain Cybernightlife (I used Advanced Web Editor for OS/2 before I migrated to Linux back in December 1998). Quanta Plus ties with Bluefish as far as web page editor of the year, for its ease of use, on the fly previewing, and the ability to handle PHP.

I prefer Bluefish as it allows the most control over how my pages look and how they are formatted. Bluefish has better CSS support than QuantaPlus, as I prefer to use a single stylesheet as opposed to embedding CSS in all HTML pages.
 
Old 02-01-2005, 05:37 PM   #70
noclue2
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Cold
Distribution: Yoper v2.1
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Where's gphpedit?

PhpEclipse?

I can't stand bluefish'es highlighting syntax. phpEclipse I love for it's project management. I love gphpedit, because it's minimalist, the syntax highlighting is awesome, and it has JUST ENOUGH features that it's enough to keep me from using nano, but it doesn't have so many it takes 5 minutes to load.
 
Old 02-01-2005, 08:18 PM   #71
ailantian
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: debian sarge
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
i haven't found any good web development editor
may be all need to improve
i use oo.org or sometimes mozilla composer
i don't use them very ofen
 
Old 02-01-2005, 09:28 PM   #72
mio_carpe
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: FL, USA
Distribution: Minislack & Gentoo
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
quanta crash to much. Looking I found screem!!!
 
Old 02-02-2005, 05:23 AM   #73
hoernerfranz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Germany, South West
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta+ - definitely.
there is nothing comparable out there - e.g.
just consider the integrated php-debugger (gubed) !
 
Old 02-02-2005, 10:44 AM   #74
ylikone
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: ArchLinux, VectorLinux, Ubuntu, Debian, Linspire
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 15
What about jEdit (from jedit.org)? As a developer, I've been using it for about 5 years now.
Yes, I know it's in the "editor" poll, but it should be here also.

Last edited by ylikone; 02-02-2005 at 10:56 AM.
 
Old 02-03-2005, 04:21 AM   #75
thedarkavenger
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Southampton, England
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quanta +

Nothing comes close, i've converted like 4 people over to linux plainly on the thoery that nothing is anywhere near. People use vi and pretend there cool but the truth is that it doesn't do anything for them only syntax highlight. Quanta is a tool for making proper websites it makes anything else look like a baby's tool.
 
  


 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration