LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

Notices


View Poll Results: Security App of the Year
nmap 195 37.14%
snort 39 7.43%
Nessus 63 12.00%
chkrootkit 43 8.19%
Tripwire 17 3.24%
tcpdump 15 2.86%
kismet 21 4.00%
fwBuilder 7 1.33%
ClamAv 82 15.62%
Firestarter 43 8.19%
Voters: 525. You may not vote on this poll

 
  Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2005, 02:48 AM   #16
CarolC
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Taiwan
Distribution: Turbolinux 10S
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Wink


I vote Tripware .
 
Old 01-04-2005, 10:29 AM   #17
chandj
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Suse, Fedora, Debian, RHE
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
nmap is too versatile. Tough choice, but it can do so much
 
Old 01-04-2005, 02:29 PM   #18
predator.hawk
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: FreeBSD-5.4-STABLE
Posts: 252

Rep: Reputation: 30
nmap .
 
Old 01-05-2005, 04:18 PM   #19
erraticassassin
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: Slackware 13.1
Posts: 131

Rep: Reputation: 18
Someone else has mentioned this as a missing option - Firestarter. For those of us who just have to look after a single home PC, it's a simple, solid solution for setting up a firewall. Much like ZoneAlarm on Windows - it just works.

Plus, when I had a couple of queries about the program, the lead developer dude was friendly and helpful. Gets my vote for that alone. Or would do, if it were an option...

Last edited by erraticassassin; 01-06-2005 at 02:34 AM.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 07:37 PM   #20
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,600

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083Reputation: 4083
Firestarter has been added.

--jeremy
 
Old 01-06-2005, 09:49 PM   #21
hari_seldon99
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Front of PC
Distribution: Linux Mandrake
Posts: 212

Rep: Reputation: 30
Nobody added shorewall

It's easier to use than iptables, and less fancy-shmancy than guarddog/firestarter.
It has more config options than the GUI's
 
Old 01-08-2005, 01:18 PM   #22
fmark
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
bitdefender for linux mail servers

I use bitdefender more than any other proposed apps.
Simply efficient. http://linux.bitdefender.com/
 
Old 01-09-2005, 12:05 PM   #23
nice_indian
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: India
Distribution: redhat 9
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
tcpdump!! But i doubt weather it is a security application.
 
Old 01-11-2005, 12:03 AM   #24
dylansmrjones
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Denmark
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 / Gentoo
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Can't vote... I want to vore for ClamAV and Firestarter ... just can't vote... unless I can vote twice or thrice ... can I vote for all them?
 
Old 01-12-2005, 08:54 AM   #25
melinda_sayang
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Petaling Jaya
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 475

Rep: Reputation: 31
firestarter.... easy to make a firewall...... so vote goes here...
 
Old 01-12-2005, 03:37 PM   #26
hari_seldon99
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Front of PC
Distribution: Linux Mandrake
Posts: 212

Rep: Reputation: 30
Can firestarter forward ports? Can it do maclisting in dual-interface setups? Can it be administered remotely?
 
Old 01-13-2005, 10:34 AM   #27
insyte
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 308

Rep: Reputation: 30
chkrootkit
 
Old 01-15-2005, 02:33 AM   #28
zatriz
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa
Distribution: Fedora,Trustix,Debian
Posts: 290

Rep: Reputation: 30
ethereal
 
Old 01-15-2005, 04:46 PM   #29
xviddivxoggmp3
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: scanf
Distribution: Redhat Enterprise 4.4 AS
Posts: 236

Rep: Reputation: 30
ethereal

This is a network analyser.
Technically it is not a security tool.
Do not get me wrong, the capability of setting the nic to promiscuous mode and sniffing packets is a good way to test your network security, but it is not made for monitoring (tripwire) or preventing access (iptables/ipchains).

Last edited by xviddivxoggmp3; 01-15-2005 at 04:52 PM.
 
Old 01-25-2005, 06:03 AM   #30
zaichik
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Iowa USA
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 419

Rep: Reputation: 30
I beg to differ. When our network is under a DDoS attack, we use ethereal to find out which IP is being hit so we can null route it and save the integrity of the rest of the network. From our other clients' perspective, we have maintained their servers' accessibility.

I see what you mean, though--it doesn't "prevent" things like the DDoS attack in the first place. I would still have to rate it as a security tool.
 
  


 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Award: Security app of the year KayJay LQ Suggestions & Feedback 1 01-29-2003 10:04 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration