LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

Notices


View Poll Results: Distribution of the Year
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 23 0.99%
Fedora 350 15.09%
Mandrakelinux 235 10.13%
Slackware 449 19.36%
Suse 235 10.13%
Debian 250 10.78%
Knoppix 43 1.85%
Gentoo 314 13.54%
DamnSmallLinux 7 0.30%
MEPIS 96 4.14%
LFS 13 0.56%
Ubuntu 176 7.59%
Yoper 32 1.38%
Xandros 27 1.16%
Linspire 17 0.73%
Arch 26 1.12%
Conectiva 7 0.30%
Amigo 2 0.09%
CentOS 3 0.13%
PClinuxOS 14 0.60%
Voters: 2319. You may not vote on this poll

 
  Search this Thread
Old 01-04-2005, 08:39 PM   #196
tamoneya
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Distribution: Ubuntu 7.10
Posts: 558

Rep: Reputation: 31

drake so far. However i would like to try gentoo and debian.
 
Old 01-04-2005, 08:59 PM   #197
ratpoison
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Long Island, NY USA
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by tamoneya
drake so far. However i would like to try gentoo and debian.
======================
Ubuntu is based on Debian. Not only will they send you NUMEROUS discs for free, they'll even pay for the postage!!
 
Old 01-04-2005, 09:01 PM   #198
seow_ming
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Currently in China
Distribution: Fedora 9
Posts: 130

Rep: Reputation: 15
Fedora ~!!! The best !! Mandrake not bad too!!!
 
Old 01-04-2005, 09:45 PM   #199
dick_onion53
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colocrappyrado
Distribution: Windows 2000, Windows XtraProblems, still looking for my linux baby
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by Harishankar
Come to that, users of Linux must have a lot of spare time
Amen to that.
 
Old 01-04-2005, 09:48 PM   #200
dick_onion53
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colocrappyrado
Distribution: Windows 2000, Windows XtraProblems, still looking for my linux baby
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 15
I want to try fedora, but i'm not sure that i want to burn ANOTHER 5 cds on it. Mandrake and SuSE really hurt my blank cd supply. Mandrake i really dont like, half the time it doesnt even start up (not sure why) and suse did horrible with my drivers. is fedora worth the 5 blank cds?
 
Old 01-04-2005, 09:55 PM   #201
ltd602
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 52

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by dick_onion53
I want to try fedora, but i'm not sure that i want to burn ANOTHER 5 cds on it. Mandrake and SuSE really hurt my blank cd supply. Mandrake i really dont like, half the time it doesnt even start up (not sure why) and suse did horrible with my drivers. is fedora worth the 5 blank cds?
Give PClinuxOS a try. A hard-drive installable LiveCD, using Synaptic, with a great-looking KDE default desktop, and best-of-breed apps. Easiest install ever.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 12:12 AM   #202
dalek
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,058
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally posted by dick_onion53
I want to try fedora, but i'm not sure that i want to burn ANOTHER 5 cds on it. Mandrake and SuSE really hurt my blank cd supply. Mandrake i really dont like, half the time it doesnt even start up (not sure why) and suse did horrible with my drivers. is fedora worth the 5 blank cds?
You only need one for Gentoo. Get the minimal CD, boot it, then start the install. It will download the rest to the hard drive as it needs it. If you have broadband.

You could use a CD-RW. After the install is done, re-use it.

Later

 
Old 01-05-2005, 12:16 AM   #203
dick_onion53
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colocrappyrado
Distribution: Windows 2000, Windows XtraProblems, still looking for my linux baby
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 15
I decided to go ahead and install Fedora --------- it sucks. I've never used an o/s with so many errors. It's so hard to do anything when there is pop-up errors all over the place. And you want to talk about drivers, my video keeps spazing out and there is no networking. I really wanted it to work but no go.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 12:33 AM   #204
dick_onion53
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colocrappyrado
Distribution: Windows 2000, Windows XtraProblems, still looking for my linux baby
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by ltd602
Give PClinuxOS a try. A hard-drive installable LiveCD, using Synaptic, with a great-looking KDE default desktop, and best-of-breed apps. Easiest install ever.
I checked out their website and it looks great. I especially like the built in filesharing stuff. I'm downloading it right now and I'll give it a try. Thanks for the info.



Regards,
Dick
 
Old 01-05-2005, 03:24 AM   #205
ratpoison
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Long Island, NY USA
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by ltd602
Give PClinuxOS a try. A hard-drive installable LiveCD, using Synaptic, with a great-looking KDE default desktop, and best-of-breed apps. Easiest install ever.
=================================
Another distro to consider would be Ubuntu. It installs from just one CD, but they mail you as many copies as you'd like in whatever format(s) you'd like (x86, 64, ppc). And get this: they don't even charge for shipping. While it appears from the above that PCLinuxOS is KDEcentric, Ubuntu installs only Gnome by default (KDE can be added.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 03:27 AM   #206
xnuxmwx
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
debian
 
Old 01-05-2005, 04:34 AM   #207
zba78
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Birmingham, England
Distribution: OpenSuSE 10.2
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 15
This might sound strange but even though I am a Slackware (v10) user and absolutely love it I voted for SuSE.

The reason is that I believe some of the new/improved features SuSE made with 9.1 & 9.2 are really amazing.

I appreciate that many of these features are probably of more benifit to new users but nevertheless they are still very impressive.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 04:47 AM   #208
Sylwester
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0

UBUNTU!!!

Clean, elegant, easy and way faster that Mdk i used before.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 07:29 AM   #209
q80slipknot
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Kuwait
Distribution: Mandrake Linux 10.0
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Darn this is hard! My top three are :Mandrake, SuSE and Slackware.

Chose Mandrake cos thats what im using at the moment, and have absolutely NO complaints with it!
 
Old 01-05-2005, 07:39 AM   #210
Boby
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 781

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Fedora Fedora Fedora
 
  


 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going from distribution to distribution safe? sausagejohnson Linux - General 8 04-30-2004 02:27 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration