2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
I used to love the old GNOME 1.4, but it's dead and gone now Except in Debian Woody...
Used KDE for a long time, but kept jumping back to GNOME.
Now I prefer GNOME (2.8.1 rocks!!), and will probably not go back to KDE again (KOffice lacks in support for MS Office file types - but I admit has some other nice features (that I don't use...)).
I use XFCE now because it is lightweight and not a memory-eater. I used to like GNOME but switched to XFCE because apps run/load faster in XFCE than in GNOME.
I use kde for my recent machine
and xface for my old machine.
When I need a lot of computation on my
powerful machine, I switch to xface desktop.
Gnome is very pretty and one must have some
experience with it. It is useful for Linux
community to know that they can have a high
standing graphic desktop. Sometime
( during presentation / game / home cinema for example), one can use it!
KDE. I gave GNOME 2.6 a real try, but ended up just hating it and switching back to KDE. I don't know what's so "pretty" about GNOME, unless you're trying to get it to look like Mac OSX, which is about the only thing it does well. I'd rather use XFCE than GNOME any day, but why would I since now I have a high-end system? So, yes, KDE.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.