Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back > Forums > 2004 Members Choice Awards
User Name
2004 Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.


View Poll Results: Database of the Year
MySQL 511 53.51%
PostgreSQL 149 15.60%
Firebird 216 22.62%
Oracle 23 2.41%
Sybase 4 0.42%
DB2 2 0.21%
Berkley DB 3 0.31%
Informix 1 0.10%
MaxDB 0 0%
sqlite 46 4.82%
Voters: 955. You may not vote on this poll

  Search this Thread
Old 01-01-2005, 06:44 PM   #16
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: openSUSE
Posts: 71

Rep: Reputation: 25

Old 01-01-2005, 07:04 PM   #17
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use Firebird SQL for desktop and client server development. For web I am using both FB and MySQL. Both are good. good luck!
Old 01-01-2005, 08:00 PM   #18
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware 10
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
I had to go Oracle since it was the only one i have ever used. Perhaps by next year i might have used another, hopefully!
Old 01-02-2005, 12:23 AM   #19
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Brisbane Queensland Australia
Distribution: Custom Debian Live ISO's
Posts: 1,290

Rep: Reputation: 62
Originally posted by Junior41180
Have to agree on this one
Old 01-02-2005, 05:30 AM   #20
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
Firebird rules!

Best regards,
Fikret Hasovic

FirebirdSQL Foundation member.
- Join today at
JEDI VCS contributor
Old 01-02-2005, 05:45 AM   #21
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: FC3
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
I prefer mysql
Old 01-02-2005, 05:53 AM   #22
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
firebird rocks. small, easy to set up, a real relational database, one-file databases, runs on a wide variety of OSes, fast, powerful... need i say more?
Old 01-02-2005, 10:37 AM   #23
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: old village
Distribution: android, BSD, CentOS, Ubuntu
Posts: 221

Rep: Reputation: 30
since i actually learned MySQL this year!!!! that's what i'm voting for..
great, fast, and easy enough for me.
scalable, and very popular.

yay! i learnted something!
-sorry, learnt.
Old 01-02-2005, 10:55 AM   #24
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Tapejara - RGS - Brazil
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Angry no frauds...

MySQL users,
just vote once on this year, please...

Firebird is the best of the best...

Luiz "RedDevil" Stefanski
Old 01-02-2005, 03:58 PM   #25
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: tassie, australia
Distribution: redhat and fedora
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
mysql, all the php things i want to use are written with mysql
Old 01-02-2005, 05:06 PM   #26
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: ATL Shawty
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Mysql,, yeah right! I like it, a lot; especially because i'm a big fan of the OpenSource community, it's just not come along enough in the Database world to be considered an elite database. Additionally; i've come across to many security issues with mysql to yet consider it able to compete with Oracle, etc. Unfortunately, i gotta stick w/Oracle.
Old 01-02-2005, 06:19 PM   #27
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 454

Rep: Reputation: 32
MySQL does everything reasonably well and it is easy to install and use. It makes a great DB for web applications although I prefer to use compiled CGI rather than PHP for speed with MySQL fro speed.
Old 01-02-2005, 11:41 PM   #28
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Red Hat 7.2
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
I voted for Firebird for being an enterprise-level database which in my opinion should be the basis for selecting a database. Not mention, the excellent support that Firebird communities providing.
Old 01-03-2005, 05:08 AM   #29
LQ Newbie
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Münchwilen (TG), Switzerland
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Thumbs up There is only one professional system..

In the oposite of MySQL, Postgresql knows the SQL Standard.
Postgresql supports nested transactions!
Postgresql can a lot more than any layman's db.

It can only be Postgre!! Thats the one!!
Old 01-03-2005, 10:28 AM   #30
Carlos Chavez
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2001
Distribution: Fedora Core
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
well, we are using PostgreSQL for 3 year, we have a payroll applications, another applications for invoicing and inventory.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1 year from now... ghostwalker Linux - General 18 01-13-2006 08:38 PM
Snort database: Closing connection to database "" Homer Glemkin Linux - Security 2 07-14-2005 06:58 PM > Forums > 2004 Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration