Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Forums > 2003 Members Choice Awards
User Name
2003 Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2003 Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2003. This is your chance to be heard!


Poll: Distribution of the Year
Poll Options
Distribution of the Year

You must log in and have one post to vote in this poll. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
Results will be available after the polls close.

The nominees are:

Red Hat

  Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2003, 03:55 AM   #136
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: NY
Distribution: RH9, RH8, Slack, Vector
Posts: 497

Rep: Reputation: 31

gotta say, vector has been a very usefull distro for me when i need to recycle old hardware into useful machines
Old 12-01-2003, 06:16 AM   #137
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Luxemburg
Distribution: Suse; debian
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 15
Originally posted by cbarnes913
Quick question: Why do so many of your favorite distros depend on the way it manages packages? I don't claim to be a linux expert or even a novice, but isn't one of the things linux boasts to be cross platform compatable, and isn't that the advantage of COMPILING software for your own unique machine, and isn't that worth the effort of learning to do it? Linux is a great and powerful operating system, but I don't think I can back up the use of precompiled packages. That is just one of the most non-linux things I can think of. I can understand being frustrated with dependencies, but then wouldn't it make more sense to go to Linux From Scratch? Then you have this wonderful familiarity with your system. You know what's installed on it, you know what isn't installed on it, and therefore, you know what you do need and what you don't need when you want to add new programs just by reading up on the dependencies on the developers site.
Ever tried to uninstall a program/module that you compiled from source?
I did, and I can tell you that it was real nightmare! There are probably still tons of files on my system hanging around, never being used.
I had this experience while trying to install gabber on my RH9 machine. A friend told me it was cool, so I decided to try it.
Started of with the gabber sources, configure told me I first needed something else, I downloaded it, configured it and again needed something else. This went on and on for a while, so that after a while I was wondering "What did I want to do? Oh yes, I was installing gabber."
After having installed tons of tar files, I got locked: install was telling me the module (can't remember which one it was) was installed already (which was correct), but configure said it was not. That was the point where I gave up and said :"I think I can live without gabber. Get rid of it". Being new to Linux, the next question rose: "How?"
A quick google and a Linux expert(!) learned me : "You don't!"
If you are lucky the developer put a uninstall flag in the Makefile, otherwise you can start to dig into Make- and logfiles to find out which file was copied where. I hadn't the courage (neither I have the time) to do that.

Moral : be very careful with what you install on your machine if you want to keep it clean.

For Linux critics : the same problem goes for Windows applications. I can give a thousand examples of commercial software where the uninstall doesn't work.

Old 12-01-2003, 06:27 AM   #138
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Warwick (
Distribution: Arch, Slackware 9.0, (knoppix standing by)
Posts: 256

Rep: Reputation: 30
Old 12-01-2003, 09:42 AM   #139
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Brasschaat, Antwerpen - Belgium
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 52

Rep: Reputation: 15
gentoo for me !
Old 12-01-2003, 01:58 PM   #140
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: The Hague Netherlands
Distribution: Mandrake 9.1 / Red Hat 9.0
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
Thumbs up My best system is

I find Mandrake 9.2 the best. Even if you see that a lot of updates are required. Shows they take you serious! Even if you get only KDE3.1.3 adn not the 3.1.4!

PCLinux Netherlands
Old 12-01-2003, 02:30 PM   #141
Raptor Ramjet
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Under a rock
Distribution: Slackware "current" - Praise "Bob" !!!!
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
Well I'm relatively new to Linux and in the past year I've tried RedHat 8, SuSE 8.2, SuSE 9.0 and Slackware 9.1. Whilst all had their good points it's undoubtedly Slackware 9.1 that gets my vote.

Despite initially seeming harder for a new user the fact that I was encouraged to work directly with configuration files and the command line meant that I'm actually learning how GNU/Linux works (with many, many thanks to all the good folk who post here on

Admittedly after the initial installation my CD writer didn't work, my KDE and XFCE desktops were unusable (default monitor resolution too hig and refresh rate too low) But a lot of reading and experimentation later and everything now works a treat. Not only that but KDE now looks gorgeous (now that I know how to set up the X Server to my liking and have got some decent fonts & icons in there !)

But my favourite thing about Slackware was the fact that it doesn't boot to a GUI by default. This really sparked my interest and was the main reason that I actually started to learn what was going on in my system.

Finally, to echo one of the other posters, kudos too to Knoppix. When I go to fix friends Windows problems (which I do often) I always leave a Knoppix CD for them to play with and the feedback's been good !

Yours looking forward to trying my first kernel upgrade (when 2.6 is finalised) and delighted with my Slackware 9.1 box.
Old 12-01-2003, 03:01 PM   #142
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Re: My best system is

After trying Suse 9, mandrake 9.2, redhat 9 and knoppix 3.3 I've returned to my first and still the best, most functional and more complete system, Suse 8. In terms of packages the suse is overwhelming (a little to much, sometimes). In terms of usability suse is again the best.
For instance:
In suse you can change from windowmaker, to kde, to gnome desktop without having to mess around in your configuration files. The windowmaker in suse is more functional than in mandrake. Suse offers you a lot of managing options that mandrake doesn´t, etc, etc, etc,...
In resume:
I'm back with Suse and, untill somebody develops a system as complete, funtional and user friendly as Suse, i'm not going to leave it... ;-)
urray linux!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Old 12-01-2003, 03:56 PM   #143
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Old 12-01-2003, 04:00 PM   #144
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Manchester, England, UK, The World....
Distribution: Gentoo/SuSE 9.0
Posts: 291

Rep: Reputation: 30
i went with redhat as it's got some power while being user-friendly enough for my family, but i have recently aquired a mac ( which i have decided to put gentoo on, as i have heard some very good things about it.
don't know about this emerge business though :|
Old 12-01-2003, 04:08 PM   #145
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Started on slackware many years ago and still love it. Tried everything else in sight, they just don't compare to slack.
Old 12-01-2003, 07:25 PM   #146
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
Originally posted by djbanaan
Simplicity is devine. Slackware.
Apparently you don't find spelling simple. Divine. In any case, Gentoo is the fastest and most customizable distribution, so my vote goes to it.
Old 12-01-2003, 07:35 PM   #147
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Apparently you don't find social skills simple. You pull out a post five pages back and criticize the spelling of someone whose native language (based on their 'location' field') isn't English? How's your Dutch?

Let's just leave it a 'rah rah gentoo', huh?

Last edited by slakmagik; 12-04-2003 at 04:29 PM.
Old 12-01-2003, 09:08 PM   #148
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Originally posted by djbanaan
Simplicity is devine. Slackware.

hey man where do i get that fluxbox theme in your signature
Old 12-02-2003, 12:19 AM   #149
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
My vote's for Mandrake 9.2. It's replaced Windows XP Professional on my computer.

Last edited by Meresin; 12-02-2003 at 12:26 AM.
Old 12-02-2003, 01:13 AM   #150
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 85
Slackware, always. -- J.W.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going from distribution to distribution safe? sausagejohnson Linux - General 8 04-30-2004 03:27 AM > Forums > 2003 Members Choice Awards

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration