*BSDThis forum is for the discussion of all BSD variants.
FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Ok folks, I am using FreeBSD 6.2 and apache22. I am getting a response of 'Permission Denied' make_sock: could not Bind 0.0.0.0:80. Orignally I receive a response of 'Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name', using alclasystems.com as the server name.
Now Binding to, I assume, port 80 is the problem. Yes, I am at the root under 'su'. I believe I was not at the root for the latter portion of this message for DN orginally. I have nothing using this port that I may be aware of. This OS(FBSD) and apache22 is running without any other activity. What am I missing here?
What do you mean?
Are you saying this is someone's IP address? If so, Am I suppose to apply an IP address? If so, How?
I thought when logging in through FBSD and 'su', starting the apache22 applic, via command: apachectl start, this would automatically connect me. Am I suppose to map an address. If so, how? I do have a registered DN and I am connected through a router with the address 192.168.1.1
What do you mean?
Are you saying this is someone's IP address? If so, Am I suppose to apply an IP address? If so, How?
I thought when logging in through FBSD and 'su', starting the apache22 applic, via command: apachectl start, this would automatically connect me. Am I suppose to map an address. If so, how? I do have a registered DN and I am connected through a router with the address 192.168.1.1
well, ok, good, using apachectl is correct.
usually it will start it up on the localhost, it would seem the
config is wrong. maybe it's a freebsd thing.
it seems odd.
so you are doing /usr/sbin/apachectl start ?
are you sure it's not up already?
tried localhost in a host browser
I am getting a response of 'Permission Denied' make_sock: could not Bind 0.0.0.0:80. Orignally I receive a response of 'Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name'
It's trivial enough to check whether something is already listening on tcp port 80.
I suspect that netstat is merely displaying the 32-bit value configured with no bounds-checking. In many ways, I would not want netstat to be checking every value it receives as this would be additional administrative overhead.
If you read the paper previously linked, you will find classful & classless (CIDR) addressing discussed. In either model, the all-ones address & all-zeroes address have special meanings. You will also find that the 32-bit IPV4 addressing scheme used today is based on inefficient assumptions, & has been overly patched to meet today's need of addressing millions of hosts as opposed to 2^32.
I suspect that netstat is merely displaying the 32-bit value configured with no bounds-checking. In many ways, I would not want netstat to be checking every value it receives as this would be additional administrative overhead.
If you read the paper previously linked, you will find classful & classless (CIDR) addressing discussed. In either model, the all-ones address & all-zeroes address have special meanings. You will also find that the 32-bit IPV4 addressing scheme used today is based on inefficient assumptions, & has been overly patched to meet today's need of addressing millions of hosts as opposed to 2^32.
I am somewhat familiar with the limited ability usage of IPV4. But this problem(Permission denied) is persistent.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.