BSD in < 64mb?
Possible?
I just need X, ssh client and vnc would be nice too. (64mb disk space, 32mb RAM). edit: I NEED X to have xhost +whatever or ssh x forwarding. I can't kdrive to do this at the moment and also can't get kdrive to start a window manager. |
64mb hah!
1.44mb bsd http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~brucem/pico_notes.htm It runs on a minimum 486 CPU with 8MB of RAM, no hard disk is required. |
Sure it's possible, just don't use kde or gnome for your desktops. Use something like fluxbox, it's a lot less of a resource hog.
|
Less than 64MB of RAM, or disk space? My OpenBSD firewall only uses about 16MB of RAM, and that's with a pretty big set of packet filtering rules, 3 instances of arpwatch, sshd, etc... You could easily run OBSD on 64MB of RAM (probably NetBSD, too). In my experience FreeBSD uses more RAM, but I hear that it scales memory usage to use "nearly all" of what you have available, so if you have less physical RAM it uses less. Also, I've never really done a minimal install of FreeBSD.
X will use by far the most RAM of any process, so you won't want a window manager front-end (like xdm, etc) just use startx to launch your actual windowing environment. Use Fluxbox (or Blackbox), or one of the similar very minimal windowing environments. |
32mb ram, 64mb disk space.
Considering this: http://featherlinux.berlios.de/ but: - yet to test - it's linux |
Hmm, 64MB of disk is really tight. Your best bet is to read up on PicoBSD. I just checked my OpenBSD install, and the minimum install looks around 120MB.
|
minimum install of FreeBSD is about 130MB but you can start to chop that down. Of course that is without any X support.
Take a look at the M0n0BSD hacker guide it does a nice job of helping you get a small footprint FreeBSD. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM. |