| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
2
|
29326
|
01-04-2010
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
None indicated
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description:
|
"We have the pleasure to announce the immediate availability of sidux 2009-03 'Momos', shipping with Linux kernel 2.6.31 and KDE 4.3.2. For 'Momos', the development had to take massive upstream changes for SysVInit, insserv, X.Org and device detection into account, but it also concentrated on furthering the KDE 4 integration into sidux and upgrading to Linux kernel 2.6.31. Subsequently, it is the first sidux release to ship without KDE 3 or Qt 3 packages. Linux kernel 2.6.31 doesn't only improve and stabilise hardware support for newer devices, it also provides initial support for USB 3.0 devices and the Sound Blaster X-Fi sound card."
|
|
Keywords:
|
kernel-2.6.31 KDE-4.3.2 USB-3.0 X-Fi
|
|
|
|
 |
11-23-2009, 10:57 PM
|
#1
|
Registered: Nov 2009
Distribution: Arch, FreeBSD, Sidux
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
bleeding edge software, easy to install
|
|
Cons:
|
easy to install
|
Not much of a real review. Been using sidux for a only a few weeks. Don't use sidux forums so I don't know much about the problems written in other reviews. Sidux is all debian so I don't see there actually being a problem with going eslewhere for help.
I am a big fan of the "rolling release" linux. I haven't had any problems with stability yet. So I don't know how well sidux does with their own repos if something in the debian sid repos gets to be unstable.
The installation was so easy and so fast I thought I might have done it wrong. I didn't. Works great right away. Also it is not bloated with unneeded or unknown software installed at the beginning like some other easy to install distros.
Everything from debian sid is there. Plus, being 100% compatible, all the other unoffical repos nobody talks about. So just about every piece of software you could ever want to use in linux is easily installed. I understand the need for a stable operating system, but for a home user I would recommend a rolling release like sidux. There is a lot of work that goes into the debian project and it seems like the sidux team tries to keep the unstable sid branch stable for it's users. Although, I haven't had any real problems with sid in the past. The only thing I see that should be followed is the one rule that the sidux team has made clear is the upgrade process. Follow that and this is one great linux distro.
|
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 10:08 PM
|
#2
|
Registered: Apr 2002
Distribution: Debian, sidux, antiX, SimplyMEPIS, Kubuntu, Mandriva, Fedora, Xandros, Arch, and many others
Posts: 560
Rep: 
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9
|
Pros:
|
FAST, clean, reliable, especially for something called "unstable"
|
|
Cons:
|
Arrogant developers, poor listeners, missing utilities once an integral part of sidux
|
This is still a great distribution, but I recommend ignoring the developer recommendations, go grab smxi and use it as long as it continues to work. sidux is a very well optimized distribution and the work that the support team does to identify breakages in the Debian Sid packages is rare, and valuable.
The forum and the arrogant attitude of a few prominent individuals there, and the cowering servitude of those who remain make the sidux forum a hostile place for anyone who is opinionated - I exited months ago, but a few months too late and caught a tongue lashing from the developers. I won't be back in the forum, I will heavily criticize the forum, but continue to praise the distribution - but only for those who can use it with skill without the aide of what may once have been a helpful place. If you are independent, use this anyway; just avoid the sidux forum!
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|