|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
24
|
3283
|
08-24-2008
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
$49.95
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
 supersize
|
|
Description:
|
Well folks, it's that time to announce a new stable Slackware release again. So, without further ado, announcing Slackware version 12.1! Since we've moved to supporting the 2.6 kernel series exclusively (and fine-tuned the system to get the most out of it), we feel that Slackware 12.1 has many improvements over our last release (Slackware 12.0) and is a must-have upgrade for any Slackware user.
|
|
Keywords:
|
slackware linux easy expert learn friendly newbie best stable performance
|
|
|
|
 |
05-26-2008, 02:23 AM
|
#1
|
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware forever.
Posts: 1,587
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: $49.95 | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
100% pure Linux OS. Stable. Fast. Simple. No blah blah.
|
|
Cons:
|
Well... If i'll find one, then i'll tell ya.
|
[ Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
Here's a way to have a PC fully powered. Even an old one. No bad surprise. No bullshit. Good reactivity of updates. No 140 cd's set you'll never use. I like the poor graphisms during installation because they introduce no bug. The configuration tools (net, packages...) are quick. On the Slackware site, you have The book, from which you can learn Linux really fast. The packages system is strong. No dependencies headaches. Slack leads you from newbie to expert.
I've learned more slackin' 6 monthes than 10 years of others OS (including other Linuxes). Well, please stop reading and just go for it.
P.S.: Big thanx to Patrick Volkerding and all other people who makes Slackware.
|
|
|
|
06-26-2008, 12:45 PM
|
#2
|
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Fedora 8, PCLinuxOS, Ubuntu, Debian Etch, Puppy 3.01, Slackware 12.1
Posts: 1,046
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9
|
Pros:
|
Fast, stable, configuable, and true to the Linux fundamentals
|
|
Cons:
|
No hand holding for the beginner
|
I first tried Slackware with 10.1 and did not return until this year with 12.1. I am glad I did return as it is better than I remembered. I installed on a Toshiba A210 laptop with a dual boot using grub (dual with another Linux, not Windows.) Slackware is not known to be laptop friendly, but with some help from the forum, I was able to configure virtually ALL of the hardware to work (even one that would NOT work with the original Vista installation.) I am not a Linux expert nor am I in the IT business. Just an everyday desktop user who loves Linux and I was able set everything up quite easily. I use quite a few distros on other laptops and a desktop, and Slack 12.1 is BY FAR the fastest and most stable. I have settled in to using it as my main system and I intend to continue with Slack from here on.
|
|
|
|
06-26-2008, 02:50 PM
|
#3
|
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 197
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Slackware doing what slackware does
|
|
Cons:
|
see above
|
There's a reason why Slackware has longevity. Don't be put off by the ncurses install and the few manual steps needed to install Slack 12.1. Some things, like partitioning your disk, are probably better done manually anyway. If you have unusual or old hardware, Slackware is probably the easiest distro to customize. The latest version brings the kernel up to 2.6.24.5, adds additional support for LVM, RAID and LUKS and works as solidly as any previous slack. No extras you don't need, fabulous support for anything you do need. No dependency handling means no dependency heck - but it's hard to appreciate until you've tried it and the alternatives.
|
|
|
|
06-26-2008, 03:00 PM
|
#4
|
Registered: Apr 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 321
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Stable - Fast - Never Breakes - No Udate Nanny
|
|
Cons:
|
Wont cut my grass
|
Quite simply put, this system is the best there is after you get past a slight learning curve. Theres no auto-updater popping up from the tool bar saying Do ya feel lucky ?. I can't count the number of times I've had the updater on other OS's hose my system. No more of that stuff for me now. I'll just stick with Slack and don't worry about updater nannies anymore.
|
|
|
|
06-26-2008, 11:54 PM
|
#5
|
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware 12.1, PC-BSD 1.5.1
Posts: 1,978
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Its....Slackware. That should say everything.
|
|
Cons:
|
I wish it came with Grub instead of Lilo...
|
I liked that the audio worked right out of the box this time. That was a minor disappointment with 12.0. Definitely a Slacker now, tried BSD and Solaris as well as Debian again, had an empty feeling. :D
Other note...I like that you have time to customize Slackware before another version comes out...*#%ub^un!tu#$^
|
|
|
|
06-27-2008, 01:00 AM
|
#6
|
Registered: Sep 2006
Posts: 155
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: $49.95 | Rating: 9
|
Pros:
|
Stable, fast, mature, simple.
|
|
Cons:
|
Not THE most newbie-friendly distro.
|
There's very little, if anything, that Slackware does wrong. It excels in most areas, specifically in regards to stability, simplicity and speed.
There's one thing though I feel would benefit Slackware: A "I'm a complete NEWBIE" install setting. When you select that option during install, Slackware should just install itself using the entire harddrive (with proper warning of course). No manual partitioning, no package selection, no asking anything but the most basic questions. Perhaps even automatically setting up X and boot directly into KDE.
I think a lot of new users could be tempted to try the oldest surviving Linux distro, if they didn't feel they had to overcome all sorts of "impossible" obstacles, just to get it up and running.
Besides that minor thing, Slackware is by far my favorite distro. I use it in my company (currently 8 desktops and 13 servers) and I use it at home. It just works.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2008, 07:26 AM
|
#7
|
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Desktop: Slackware 12.1 + Debian testing // Laptop: Slackware 12.1 + Ubuntu 8.04 + XP Pro
Posts: 1,123
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Everything
|
|
Cons:
|
Nothing
|
Contrary to rumour and myth, Slack is a suitable distro for newbies, provided they are willing to engage their brains a little now and then. My first experience with GNU/Linux was installing Slackware 10 in 2005, I was a relative newbie to computers in general then, but I had little difficulty. Since then I've used 11, 12.0, and now 12.1, and each issue has been easier to install and configure. Personally, I just find Slackware a lot more interesting than other distros I've tried. I always do a full install, since I never know what aspect or field of computing I will get interested in next. No hunting through Package Managers for bits and pieces. I would recommend Slackware 12.1 to anyone, whatever their level of experience or needs.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2008, 08:02 AM
|
#8
|
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 22
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Stability, intuitiveness
|
|
Cons:
|
may intimidate at first try, seems plain until you gain experience with it
|
Slackware 12.0 was the first version I ran, and I decided to go with a fresh installation of 12.1. I have been glad. No problems with installation, and I have been happily adding packages in the last few days. Slackware simply runs better than any other Linux I have tried.
Slackware certainly isn't for everyone. I have found, however, a certain amount of DIY to be necessary with every distribution I have used, regardless of how trouble-free and clean they seemed to me initially.
Slackware's DIY is on the front end; once done, it will run trouble free until you remove it. The debian-based and rpm distributions I have used were slick on the front end, but gave problems later.
When it comes to fixing debian-based or rpm-based distributions, I simply don't have the motivation; I do come back to Slackware.
Edit: I had a subscription with v 11.0 and v. 12.0, but downloaded 12.1.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2008, 08:49 AM
|
#9
|
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Slackware since 1997
Posts: 131
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Stable, fast, strong, secure, adaptable, expandable, simple, Unix like, etc, etc, etc....
|
|
Cons:
|
Need to read a lot, before be satisfied (just a joke) :P
|
My first linux distro was slackware 3 or 4 (don't remember) on a magazine in 1997.
After read the magazine and the README on the disk i try to make my first installation of linux, I remember it wasn't easy and it's that I like from this, it was a goal to comply.
After few hours reading and trying and falling, finally I achieved my objective with this distribution, making work my first graphic environment, myself.
I loved since the first moment.
Currently is my desktop environment and I still working with it, upgrading and reinstalling as needed. I recommend it also for newbees. Just take a look.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2008, 11:52 AM
|
#10
|
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 2,897
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
As close to UNIX as you can get! Sorry BSD users. :)
|
|
Cons:
|
|
Slackware 12.1 is great! The oldest and Stable GNU/Linux. I would recommend that everyone read the provided documentation; Slackware-HOWTO, ANNOUNCE.12_1,RELEASE_NOTES, CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT, UPGRADE.TXT to name a few. All the .txt files are on your install cd/dvd. Most people run into 'Gotchas' because they fail to read the documentation to get information that is relative to their needs.
My review would not be objective since I have used Slackware since the early days. We used it in our laboratory for instrumentation pc platforms, it was a lot cheaper than a SYSV license for a pc platform.
I really enjoy the use of Slackware on my bench machines along with my desktop machines.
As for the myth that Slackware installation on a laptop is hard. No way! It will and does install without too much effort on a Laptop. I've got it installed on several Laptops like Gateway Laptops and several IBM ThinkPads that are used as controllers. READING and some research will get you an install of Slackware to just about any machine of choice.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2008, 02:54 PM
|
#11
|
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 382
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
fast, stable and secure
|
|
Cons:
|
fast, stable and secure
|
The pros are the usual suspects (on Slackware), the cons too, in a way. Because a properly set-up Slack box hardly needs any looking after and just runs and runs without any trouble, you could say Slackware is actually quite boring.
Just kidding. ;)
|
|
|
|
06-28-2008, 02:04 AM
|
#12
|
Registered: Jun 2008
Distribution: Slackware forever
Posts: 5
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
blazing fast, ROCK SOLID, customizable, 100% pure Linux OS, simple, secure
|
|
Cons:
|
nothing so far
|
Even if you're a newbie, I'd suggest you give it a shot. What Slackware actually does is, it will take you to the level you can't imagine you can reach.
Believe it or not, Slackware is my first Linux OS even though I was a complete newbie that time. I have read several articles that says it's hard to install blah blah but that didn't hold me back. Many newbies would probably think it's hard but the truth to the matter is it's not!
I think the main source of their problem is that they didn't read the documentation until they got frustrated.
The RULE is simple: read the doc, follow the instructions, and USE your common sense. :)
ENJOY slackware!
|
|
|
|
06-28-2008, 09:12 PM
|
#13
|
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 266
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Simplicity, stability, easy of use
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
I've been using Slack since 10, and haven't looked back. I've tried other distros, but they just don't have the certain "something". The package management system is soooo easy, yet extremely powerful. No dependency hell. Solid as a rock. Just got a co-worker using Slack as well. Hopefully he'll be writing one of these soon. I think that Slackware is the perfect distro for Linux newcomers because it makes you so how everything actually works under all the point and click fluff. I've learned much more from using Slack than any other distro (except LFS).
|
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 06:15 PM
|
#14
|
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 6
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
It does what you tell it too. And if you ask it correctly, you never have to ask for it again.
|
|
Cons:
|
Doesn't fetch beer?
|
I believe I started on Slackware 7(2000 or so). It is the perfect distro for learning linux. Once you start using it and learn the advantages of running a system without complication, you never want to leave it. Slackware has been running on my servers constantly since the day I discovered it and wouldn't want it any other way. I have tried and still play with many different distros(Some good, some bad) and I always come back to Slackware. It works, it's solid, and it's Slack!
|
|
|
|
07-03-2008, 06:34 PM
|
#15
|
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: Slackware 12.1 Kernel 2.6.26
Posts: 290
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Stable, great community, fast, good learning tool
|
|
Cons:
|
Decent learning curve when you first start
|
I have been using Slackware since 11.0 and i must say that even though the learning curve was a bit steep at first, i learned so much about how my systems works. The online community is great and helpful if you are willing to learn and read the manual a bit. I think though that the main pro of Slackware is the fact that it is as stable as hell. You have to TRY to break it to do so, and most the time it will end up being a UI (user to interface, aka YOU) error that screws it up.
I would not recommend this distro to people who just want an OS, but i would recommend this to anyone who wants to learn about Linux and have a chance to see how everything works together and what a well rounded, stable OS looks like.
|
|
|
|
07-04-2008, 02:39 AM
|
#16
|
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: 100% Slackware or Slamd64
Posts: 3,625
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
fast, stable, secure, simple, does not get in your way
|
|
Cons:
|
people think it's hard to use, but that's cuz they don't RTFM
|
[ Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
I think it's currently the best distro in existence. If you think all distros suck, then you haven't tried Slackware. Do try it before you go back to Window$, and do RTFM before you begin or you are much more likely to fail and say Slackware sucks like many reviewers have done, and will probably continue to do.
To date there hasn't been a single Slackware release that has not met my expectations or surpassed them. How does Pat V. do it ? I dunno, guess that's why they call him "the man" :)
|
|
|
|
07-04-2008, 03:11 AM
|
#17
|
Registered: Sep 2006
Distribution: slackware 12 and current
Posts: 340
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Stable, fast, great community,unobtrusive,easily configurable
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
Yet again a superb release from the Slackware team. Following the standards by keeping things simple and not trying to automate procedures i.e. it never gets in the way.
The best distro by far...
|
|
|
|
07-05-2008, 12:09 PM
|
#18
|
Registered: Nov 2006
Distribution: Slackware current / 2.6.25.10
Posts: 1
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
short installation time, rock solid, never locks you out
|
|
Cons:
|
very addictive (a day without slack and i'm flat on my back)
|
Why do people blather on Slackware being not suitable for newbies? If newbies had to install MX HindOS manually, wouldn't they start to cry? I guess so. I started my Linux live with a SuSE 6.x in 1999 and fumbled nearly a week to get all things running. Since 2001 i'm a happy Slackware user without configuration files overwritten by obscure tools or upgrades leaving you alone with rip and eip messages from the kernel. A big pro is the usage of vanilla kernels and packages (patches only if necessary), thus making it easy to compile additional software. If all distros were as valuable as Slackware, we wouldn't have had discussions about GNU/Linux being an OS for gurus only.
|
|
|
|
07-21-2008, 10:40 AM
|
#19
|
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 32
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
super stable, very simple, great distro for beginners
|
|
Cons:
|
none in my opinion
|
Best distro for beginners who WANT to learn how to work with linux systems (leave Fedora for the yuppies and wannabes :))
|
|
|
|
08-11-2008, 01:07 AM
|
#20
|
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 8
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Functionality, stability... it's simply awesome.
|
|
Cons:
|
... it doesn't make me breakfast?
|
Slackware can be very intimidating for a Linux newbie, sure. I'd been bouncing around between distros for a couple years (Mandrake/iva, Fedora, openSUSE, Ubuntu, you name it), and always wasn't quite there. I love Linux, and each distro had a unique flavor... but nothing really grabbed me yet.
I was a little intimidated by Slackware, but it was completely worth it. This is my first Slackware, and while I'd highly recommend having a book/laptop nearby for some advice along the way.
Take your time, read a lot, and get ready for the smoothest, sweetest OS you've ever had the joy of installing.
Viva la Slack!
|
|
|
|
08-12-2008, 12:43 PM
|
#21
|
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware 12.0, Ubuntu 8.04
Posts: 46
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Rock solid, great for learning
|
|
Cons:
|
Not as lean as I would like
|
Slackware was the first distro that I stuck with. I used it to learn Linux and set up a web server, FTP, and SSH. The only times that machine has ever been off has been power outages. It has never crashed, never even hic uped. It just keeps going. The only complaint I can think of is during the installation there are too many packages to weed through. I like to have a very lean system so it takes a while.
|
|
|
|
|