|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
8
|
3326
|
07-09-2008
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
None indicated
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description:
|
New version for centos
|
|
|
|
 |
02-05-2008, 04:47 AM
|
#1
|
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 0
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 0
[ Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
Use chkconfig for particuler service like Mysql:
chkconfig --levels 235 mysqld on
then it will work as serive,
service mysqld restart.
Shrii
|
|
|
|
|
03-10-2008, 11:44 AM
|
#2
|
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 0
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 8
|
Pros:
|
Stable, good yum-repository support
|
|
Cons:
|
Java / gjc / gcc compatibility issues
|
At our site(s), we're running RHEL3-5 as a server platform. Being fairly comfortable with Redhat, I decided to replace Windows as my desktop OS with CentOS 5.1. (Originally Centos 4.3, then upgraded to 5.1 a few months ago) So far, version 5.1 has been an extremely stable OS, with plenty of quality yum repository support. I have struggled with the jvm compatibility, though. Getting Sun's JDK to play well with Redhat's default gjc/javac is more trouble than it should be, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-27-2008, 09:55 PM
|
#3
|
Registered: Mar 2008
Distribution: OpenBSD
Posts: 62
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 8
|
Pros:
|
Good selection of packages, GNOME and KDE together, nice enviroment.
|
|
Cons:
|
Not very many installation customizing, I don't like the package manager, huge download
|
Over all, this is a nice Operating System -- the first Linux distribution I ever tried on my own system.
Although, this is the most stable OS I think I've ever used....
I think the package management would be MUCH better if things such as, having a system that looked like:
Category
|
Software Group
|
Software
instead of:
Category
|
Software Group (X of Y packages installed)
But that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008, 09:38 AM
|
#4
|
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 34
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9
|
Pros:
|
Very good package management / Very stable system
|
|
Cons:
|
Java issues
|
Best Linux distro I've used on my own machine, very stable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-08-2008, 04:40 PM
|
#5
|
Registered: Dec 2004
Distribution: Centos 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5
Posts: 401
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 9
|
Pros:
|
Server
|
|
Cons:
|
Multimedia
|
Great for a server environment, needs much work for a multimedia machine. If you're looking for a multimedia OS I would go elsewhere. But for a server machine this is great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-14-2008, 01:34 PM
|
#6
|
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: CentOS 5
Posts: 11
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
Well supported, long release cycle, secure.
|
|
Cons:
|
Heavily patched kernels to conform to upstream kernels.
|
CentOS 5 is, in my opinion, the best and most stable Linux distribution that I have tested and used. It has quickly become my OS of choice.
I still like to test drive other distributions from time to time, but I always come back to CentOS.
Good stuff!
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-02-2008, 09:36 AM
|
#7
|
Registered: Apr 2007
Distribution: CentOS, RHEL, Fedora
Posts: 25
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
|
Pros:
|
stabilty, scalability, support
|
|
Cons:
|
none
|
I'd bounced around between distros for some time, mostly using Slackware & Debian, then found the RHEL binary compatible CentOS.
I have never looked back.
Using it on my public web server and my desktop workstations as well as having implemented it for clients.
Rock solid, great community support (Go CentOS Team!), and very robust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2008, 10:06 AM
|
#8
|
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 31
|
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 8
|
Pros:
|
Very stable, complient to linux standard e.g. filesystem
|
|
Cons:
|
Better usability
|
I first was a fedora die hard until I set up CentOS 5.0 for a server which I manage. I have not tried it for multimedia however.
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.
|
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
|
 Latest Threads
LQ News
LQ Podcast
LQ Radio
|
|
