Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
SLAX is a small-sized Live CD using unionfs and based on Slackware. In 190 MB for standard edition it includes good amount of useful software. It includes X windows system and allows choice between KDE and fluxbox for desktop environment/wm.
Special (modified) versions of SLAX also exist.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: D/L | Rating: 10
Pros:
Modular, small package, yet looks good with KDE and includes mostly everything you need, can be copied to RAM
Cons:
Not many, however, documentation is not included for size reasons
If you are new to Linux, I think Slax is a good way to get started. It is how I started out. The community is very helpful, and friendly, most of the time. Slax includes KDE, and Fluxbox is the standard version. It boots up quite quickly, and also has the ability to be copied to RAM, which speeds it up even more.
There are other Slax versions, and Popcorn is a really great one, which doesn't include KDE, but XFCE. It is made for websurfing and multimedia.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: D/L | Rating: 10
Pros:
Really Nice GUI/Based on Slackware.
Cons:
Sort of Minimalist
If you like Slackware, Slax is the live distro for you!
I was suprised when I first booted this live-cd and it took me straight to the command line, even though this is the exact behavior of Slackware. I was even more suprised when I typed startx. It booted into a GUI that looked planned out a polished. If I had a GUI like this I wouldn't mind changing my startup scripts to boot to runlevel 4! (5 for other distros)
One of the unique features of this distro is webconfig. It's sort of like Knoppix's persistant home, only over the web. You boot Slax with you password and all your configuration gets saved to the Slax server, and can be restored again over the web!
If you want to try Slackware, and want something more than ZipSlack, Slax is the live-cd distro for you!
Distribution: Arch Linux (kernel 2.6.19). I also like these two livecds: Slax and DSL
Posts: 28
Rep:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
Pros:
quick, no-bugs, easy, very considerate size at about 200 megs
Cons:
as a livecd; none
Looking for replacements for my mandriva le 2005 I took a look at this livecd and I am really happy I did. This boots from cd about 2 times quicker into kde than mandriva does into icewm!
All hardware was recognized, internet working on all boxes I tried it on and you have everything you need. I was surprised by kde also, the version I got with mandriva must be a bit outdated, because here it was quick and the programs were improved and not buggy at all.
I am looking for something simple and quick like this, when its possible to install it I will. This is what I give the xp users to show what they're missing. I want to buy a usb stick dedicated to slax so I could use it one my friends computer.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
Pros:
Quick , slick , modular and Slackware-like
Cons:
none
I have used the Popcorn and KillBill versions of this LiveCD. It is now my favourite liveCD.
Just like Slackware everything is detected and works - XWindows at 1024x768, my cable internet. Unlike Slackware the mouse wheel is configured in XWindows and you start with read access to VFAT partitions.
A good trick is to run Slax and copy the relevent sections of xorg.conf and fstab to your Slackware installation, if you have difficulty setting them in Slackware.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
Pros:
good hw-detection, modules
Cons:
none found , so far!
A very good live-distro!
All hardware i tested it on was detected.
The module-system makes it very easy to add any sofware you want, make an iso and burn your own custom live-CD. With about 500 mb available on a cd-rom you have plenty of room to do so.
I use it with the hardware-lister (lshw) to do a quick scan of an unknown PC.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10
Pros:
Amazing for the size, wonderful for beginners!
Cons:
Not full fetured, and driver support is slacking (lol)
My favorite live distro of all time, I started on Slax, and I still run Slax today. (On one of my computers at least) I have the server version with nano and grub modules, and find it has everything I need (for programming and web design work that I do on my cheep (old) laptop). I recommend the hard drive install, even though the creator doesn't, especially for computers with small hard drives (say 2 gigs, like my old compaq) but also have enough ram to run it. (you need 36 ram to run without KDE, and I forget how much with KDE running, but I believe its a little over 200 megs)
I build my LFS (Linux From Scratch) system off this without any problems. And find it useful for many occasions. Its a simple, semi-lightweight system, which I completely adore.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.