LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Reviews > Distributions > Fedora Project
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Review · Download your favorite Linux Distributions ·
 

Fedora 18
Reviews Views Date of last review
2 9486 04-01-2013
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
50% of reviewers None indicated 8.0



Description: "The Fedora project is incredibly delighted to announce the release of Fedora 18. What's new? The user interface for Fedora's installation software, Anaconda, has been completely re-written from the ground up. Making its debut in Fedora 18, the new UI introduces major improvements to the installation experience. It uses a hub-and-spoke model that makes installation easier for new users, offering them concise explanations about their choices. Advanced users and system administrators are of course still able to take advantage of more complex options. The general look and feel of the installation experience has been vastly upgraded, providing modern, clean, and comprehensible visuals during the process."
Keywords: Redhat-based new-intstallation hub-and-spoke-model


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 01-22-2013, 04:38 PM   #1
DavidMcCann
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 2,971

Rep: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 6

Pros: It works well eventually
Cons: but there's a lot to do. Next year you have to do it all again.



This review is of Fedora’s 32-bit live disks for Gnome and Xfce. These come as hybrid iso files, which can be put on a USB stick without Unetbootin. I was going to review the standard disk, which is not live, but which offers lots of options and will upgrade version 17. Unfortunately, that would not install: the installer complained of a squashfs error. Since the disk’s check had pronounced all of its files to be sound, that was presumably a bug.

The installer has been rewritten, and not for the better: at one stage I almost gave up because I was uncertain of what it was likely to do. As a poster at Bugzilla remarked, the developers might do well to read Apple’s design guide. It is essential to read the on-line instructions very carefully before attempting to install, particularly those about partitioning. The standard version has also lost some of the customisation options which were so useful. On the good side, encryption can still be applied to any partition except that containing /boot.

With Fedora, one has to install media codecs from the RPM Fusion repository, and this had to be done from the command line with GPG checking disabled because of a bug in yum. Gnash, the free replacement for Flash, also has to be installed.

The Gnome version came with LibreOffice, Firefox, Evolution, Empathy, Rhythmbox, Totem, and Shotwell. Evolution gave several critical warnings when run from the CLI. Totem refused to play any videos, complaining that it couldn’t find the plugins. I installed Gnome-mplayer, but that was impossibly slow. Both the pager and notification area refused to work if I changed the colour of the panel, perhaps because I was using the fallback version of Gnome. The keyboard configuration tool also failed to work.

The Xfce version came with Abiword, both Firefox and Midori, Claws mail, Pidgin, Parole, and Pragha, all of which ran from the CLI without bug reports. When I actually used Parole, however, it failed to play any videos, exactly as in Fedora 17. Some useful things were missing, like the services manager and the menu editor. For adding software, gpk was replaced by yumex: no listing by categories. That did not make finding a dictionary for Abiword any easier.

Both versions lost my ethernet port and the configuration tool proved a bit unstable. Generally, however, the configuration tools are good (my USB speakers were easily set up) although some lacked help in Xfce because they expect to use Gnome’s yelp. The firewall has various ports left open by default, as usual.

I used Fedora from versions 1 to 14: watching its subsequent career has been like seeing an old friend take to drink.
 
Old 04-01-2013, 03:47 PM   #2
SharpyWarpy
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Fedora 18
Posts: 862

Rep: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 10

Pros: Very reliable
Cons: Setting up


It seems with every other release it gets more difficult setting everything up the way I want. I have to disable Nepomuk, remove apper, disable SELinux and install a lot of software from repos outside Fedora, like MPlayer, etc. But after all that, which typically takes anywhere from 2 days to a week. More and more I run into the inability to remove software I don't want because of dependencies. Oh well, I suspect it's the same way with other distros. I'm well acquainted with Fedora and I'll stay with it because once I finally get it right it's rock solid. But, again, I suspect it's that way with other distros too. All that said I highly recommend Fedora to those who have used other distros and want something a bit more challenging yet reliable.
 




  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration