LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Reviews > Distributions > Other
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Review · Download your favorite Linux Distributions ·
 

Slackel KDE-4.9.2
Reviews Views Date of last review
1 4929 03-29-2013
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
No recommendations None indicated 7.0



Description: "Slackel Live KDE-4.9.2 has been released. A collection of two KDE live DVD images are immediately available that can be burned to a DVD or used with a USB drive. The Slackel live DVD images include Linux kernel 3.2.29. Slackel Live KDE-4.9.2 includes the current tree of Slackware Linux and KDE 4.9.2, accompanied by a rich collection of KDE-centric software. Firefox 16.0.2, KMail, KTorrent, Akregator, Kopete, OpenJRE 7u9, Pidgin, gFTP, GParted, wicd, slapt-get and Gslapt, sourcery. In the multimedia section Bangarang 2.1, Clementine 1.0.1, K3b 2.0.2 are all included."
Keywords: Slackware-based kernel-3.2.29 KDE-centric-software


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 03-29-2013, 04:08 PM   #1
DavidMcCann
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 3,008

Rep: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 7

Pros: Good quality
Cons: Little different to Salix KDE and only one developer



Slackel is based on Slackware and Salix, using both their repositories as well as its own. I tested the 32-bit version.

The live session was one of the slowest and bigest KDEs I’ve yet to see. The software included Firefox, Kmail, Kopete & Pidgin, Clementine, Bangarang, Krita, Kolourpaint, and the Calligra office suite. As one would expect from its origins, all left only a few minor warnings when run from the command line. With three repositories, there’s quite a good selection of extra software available. The Flash plugin was installed, but not the media codecs; as in Salix, there’s a tool in the menu to install them. The installer is a very simple graphical one, which doesn’t allow one to decide where the bootloader will go or what to include in it. Since I didn’t fancy having to configure Lilo to boot my working Linux and then reinstalling its Grub, I did not attempt to install Slackel.

Two questions spring to mind. What has Slackel got that Salix hasn’t? Is installing a one-man distribution a good idea? The answers are ‘not much’ and ‘probably not’, which is why I wouldn’t recommend it to any but the curious distro-hopper.
 




  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration