LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Reviews > Distributions > Arch
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Review · Download your favorite Linux Distributions ·
 

Arch Linux 2012.10.06
Reviews Views Date of last review
2 6996 01-29-2013
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
No recommendations None indicated 4.0



Description: "The October release of the Arch Linux install medium is available for download and can be used for new installs or as a rescue system. It contains a set of updated packages and the following notable changes: systemd is used to boot up the live system; initscripts are no longer available on the live system but are still installed by default on the target system - this is likely to change in the near future; EFI boot and setup has been simplified; EFI boot is used to display a menu on EFI systems; the following new packages are available on the live system: ethtool, FSArchiver, Gummiboot, Midnight Commander, Partclone, Partimage, rEFInd, rfkill, sudo, TestDisk, wget, xl2tpd."
Keywords: new-install rescue-system EFI-boot Gummiboot


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 11-03-2012, 01:17 PM   #1
DavidMcCann
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 3,051

Rep: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 2

Pros:
Cons:



Arch is like Slackware or Gentoo: you’ll like it if it’s the sort of thing you like, and if you do like it you can easily become a little over-enthusiastic!

The first requirement is to print out a copy of the beginner’s guide, because there’s no installer: it’s all done by hand with about a dozen commands to enter (like ‘genfstab -p /mnt >> /mnt/etc/fstab’) and some files to edit. There is a manual on the disk (install.txt) which you can view with ‘more’ in tty2, but it’s very sketchy: typical instructions are ‘partition the disk’ and ‘install grub’.

One should end up with a CLI installation into which one can boot, install a graphical environment, create a user, and add programs. The last time I tested Arch, it took a whole day to get a usable system. This time I lost my internet connection halfway though downloading the packages for the GUI, and I never manged to get it back.

If the ‘Arch Way’ appeals to you, then I’d advise cheating and installing it via Archbang or Bridge!
 
Old 01-29-2013, 04:05 AM   #2
Thor_2.0
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,209

Rep: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 6

Pros: Full control
Cons: Not for the beginner!!!!


First off: I LOVE Arch Linux. It's the one I've learned the most from. The lack of a decent installer (CLI as suggested here?) kills the whole thing.
If you have some users running the thing and there's a crash, forget about a quick re-install with the latest one.
At crunch time, setting up an installer and letting it do the install (semi) unattended is a must.
Where did my update go wrong? By using the wrong console. I had a remainder of my Gnome desktop still around after I moved to XFCE, the Gnome terminal failed to save the Kernel path properly, thus I was left with a dead system.
Arch is NOT for the beginner. Arch is (IMHO) [COLOR="Red"]the better distro around,[/COLOR] if you want to learn Linux, not if you need a quick-ready desktop...
 




  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration