LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Reviews > Distributions > Other
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Review · Download your favorite Linux Distributions ·
« Previous Product 

Manjaro 0.8.0
Reviews Views Date of last review
1 10293 08-29-2012
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
No recommendations None indicated 5.0



Description: "We are proud to announce our default Manjaro edition featuring Xfce 4.10, Linux kernel 3.4.9, X.Org 7.6 with X.Org Server 1.12.3 and GCC 4.7.1. Manjaro Linux targets beginners and advanced users at the same time. We provide user interface tools and scripts to make life easier. Manjaro supports NVIDIA's Optimus technology out of the box. You can choose between Nouveau/Intel or NVIDIA/Intel drivers combination. Manjaro hardware detection tool will configure your graphic cards automatically and with help of Bumblebee bbswitch it is possible to switch to your desired graphic mode."
Keywords: Arch-based kernel-3.4.9 Xfce NVIDIA's-Optimus-technology


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 08-29-2012, 11:14 AM   #1
DavidMcCann
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 3,008

Rep: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? no | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 5

Pros:
Cons:



Manjaro is an Arch derivative which claims to offer easier installation and more stable software: the repository is Arch compatible, but slower to accept new programs.

There doesn’t seem to be any manual to read, so I just booted the CD. The start screen offered 3 live sessions: GUI with free drivers, GUI with proprietary drivers, or CLI. When I opted for the first, the computer eventually hung. A little investigating revealed that they’d omitted to provide any graphics drivers other than Nvidia, ATI, and Intel: not even VESA! To install, I had to run the installer from a CLI session. Then, after rebooting, I used pacman in a virtual terminal to find and install a driver, after which I could use my GUI.

There were few applications installed: just Firefox, Parole, Thunderbird, Pidgin, and Gimp. Codecs were installed and working, also Flash. Unlike other Arch derivatives, my USB speakers were ignored even after creating ~/.asoundrc.

A graphical package manager was provided – Fedora’s GPK – but it didn't seem to do anything except offer updates, so I used pacman.

If you have the average computer, then graphics would be available from the start. But that sort of error suggests carelessness. If you want Arch with Xfce and a quick installer, Bridge is probably a better choice
 




  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration