LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Reviews > Distributions > Other
User Name
Password

Notices

Search · Register · Submit New Review · Download your favorite Linux Distributions ·
« Previous Product  · Next Product »

WhiteBox Enterprise Linux 3
Reviews Views Date of last review
2 59466 12-30-2004
spacer
Recommended By Average Price Average Rating
100% of reviewers None indicated 9.0



Description: White Box EL 3 has all the same look and feel as RHEL because essentally it is! The makers of WBEL took the source for RHEL and stripped out the RH items and let the ability to do updates and all the full functionality of RHEL3
Keywords: This is same as RHEL3 with all RH taken out.


Author
Post A Reply 
Old 03-27-2004, 11:24 AM   #1
XavierP
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176

Rep: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: D/L | Rating: 8

Pros: Seems faster than RH9 and definitely faster than Fedora
Cons: Still looks like RH



First a confession - I like RedHat. RH8 and then 9 were my first 2 distros which stayed on the pc. I dislike Fedora. WhiteBox was recommended to me and so I finally installed it.

The install went very well - one thing, on the website it says you only need discs 1 and 2 - 3 is needed (or at least I needed it) even though it was only for the final 3 minutes of the install.

Everything you expect from RH is here, it's stable, it works, it looks good and it's free to download. No real downsides at all - unless you don't like RH products, of course.

Definitely recommended to people who want RH ES but don;t want to pay, to people who dislike Fedora but want to keep RH on the system and also to new users since RH products are great for new starters on Linux.
 
Old 12-30-2004, 05:14 PM   #2
bobothn
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Distribution: Server, laptop running fedora 5, Game workstation ubuntu
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: Reputation:
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: D/L | Rating: 10

Pros: Rh Rules Fast Stable user freindly
Cons: ~bad stuf none i can think of


ok i started with rh 8 loved it moved up to 9 and sat using it for about a year then all of the sunden my updates stoped coming. i got upset. so i decided to up grade to fedor. never got it working right. bout 8 months had one version installed then the next tryed up dating nothing was wright would get web server up nd running for a day or to then have to reset it. all bad.




then i found out about white box i love it it is rh9 and so much more first install and my webserver was up and running never needed to stop it cept for when i was updating been running for close to 4 months now. works great.
 




  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement

My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration