Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
This release started as a copy of lenny, and is currently in a state called "testing". That means that things should not break as badly as in unstable or experimental distributions, because packages are allowed to enter this distribution only after a certain period of time has passed, and when they don't have any release-critical bugs filed against them.
Would you recommend the product? yes | Price you paid?: None indicated | Rating: 8
Stable (so far), up to date, but not bleeding edge
long installation with "netinst"
First I hope this observation (review) ends up in the correct place under Debian, Testing, Squeeze.
Second, this installation is running in VirtualBox as a test.
Third, I'm not a heavy user whatever that is; currently I basically surf the net, use OpenOffice, and a windows program running in Wine.
Why Debian testing? - After looking at DistroWatch and comparing packages with Lenny and unstable sid it seemed like a decent compromise and simple curiosity.
Currently Mint 7 is installed on the wife's desktop, an older Asus AMD motherboard, and Mint 8 on my Acer 3100 laptop (AMD Sempron 3200+ and ATI Radeon Xpress 1100). Both have been fine but prefer Mint 7 over 8; can't put my finger on it but just do. Mint, basically based on Ubuntu with improvements (my opinion), which is based on Debian; but after ready some reviews not sure where they are headed so to speak. What if Ubuntu 10.4 / Mint 9 just doesn't do it for me? So why not just use Debian I ask?
I installed using the "netinst" disk which went fine but took a while to load using either the "check for updates" during install or installing the updates later. We're talking a couple of hours all together and I'm on a 1.5 Mbps DSL line.
I also tried using just the first two CD ISO's which did not work for me; I couldn't get past the stage of loading applications and it never asked for the second CD.
One thing that did throw me a little was using the default "trunk-686" kernel at loading which didn't want to play nice with the VirtualBox Guest Additions. The "2.6.32-3-686" kernel works fine. On a previous install I did remove the "trunk-686" kernel and updated the grub menu, but it wanted to hang after that trying to load the "2.6.32-3-686" kernel. On this install I've left it alone for now.
So far Squeeze has worked fine in VirtualBox for my needs; Web surfing, OpenOffice, Wine (using their latest repository), networking, remote printing, KDE games (wife plays), etc.
Updates have been painless and haven't broken anything yet.
What can I say; it's been pretty uneventful.
I wish I had a machine just to test things without using VirtualBox.
Once Mint 9 comes out I will probably load it on the Desktop and re-install Debian Squeeze on the lappie for real and see how they compare.
In the meantime if something comes up on the current install I'll update.
If you like a Debian base, want the latest software, use a computer to get your work done, so far, Squeeze seems to be a reasonable choice.