| VectorLinux This forum is for the discussion of VectorLinux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
05-16-2004, 03:11 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245
Rep:
|
curious problem
Ive got a presario 4770 that i scavenged its a p200 with 48 meg ram, some sort of s3trio onboard graphics, 4gig hd etc...Im locked out of the bios I tried adding more mem but itsa no go..... my question I installed vector 3.2 had a hell of time configuring x even tried copying the exact config I got from running damn small linux and no go...got it all running and its DOG slow almost unusable...now dsl running from the cd was fine..the machine is not on my net so I cant post config info....what should I check?? I dont think it is a lost cause , cause dsl from cd ran well...ideas??
|
|
|
|
05-16-2004, 11:54 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: RedHat (RHEL, FC, CentOS), openSuSE, Mac OS X
Posts: 652
Rep:
|
define dog slow ... it's a p200 with jack all ram, running a GUI is going to be slow, especially KDE or Gnome.
Try IceWM if you must have a GUI, but i'd be inclined to say that a 200 ain't gonna do GUI. Maybe if you went for something old like SuSE 6.2 or RedHat 7.0 .... but anything recent is going to want something fast. Especially current GUI's
I had a 166 6.2 SuSE Pro ran fine, RedHat 7.0 was ok. 7.1 was bearable. 7.2 leaning towards painful, and after that i gave up. I did try debian 3.0r0 on it and that was torture, as was Slackware 9.0 ...
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 05:35 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
but i'd be inclined to say that a 200 ain't gonna do GUI.
|
I call BULLOCKS!
There's plenty of lightweight WMs , that'll run ok on a system like that.
IceWM and Fluxbox will be a relief after having tried KDE or Gnome.
If only for the lack of bloat....
What's more effective , is go through the list of servers , started automatically and disabling the ones you don't use anyway.
Replacing XFree with Xorg , will help some as well.
And re-compile the kernel for your architecture : Compiled for i586 works much better on such a system than the default i386.
These are just a few tips.
Use at your leisure.(and risk , maybe....)
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 06:45 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245
Original Poster
Rep:
|
dog slow is 30-30 seconds for a window to open...I wasnt running kde or gnome I wouldnt expect to be able to...however I know this machine can run dare I say fast because with dsl from the cd it was....now you might say well just load dsl to the hd,however thats not what I wish to do...vector has speed I just need to know how to get it there...
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 07:03 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
That's not a matter of tweaking ; That's a case of "Something Gone Awfully Wrong Somewhere"(tm)
I had Vector4.0 once running on a P120 laptop with 32MB of RAM and while not exactly a speed-demon , it still wasn't even remotely as slow as that.(didn't get pcmcia working , though...)
I'd advice : Do a clean re-install and monitor every step carefully. Keep pen & paper handy.(in case you get an error-message)
You might also try another formatting. I always use ext-3 and I'm pretty content with that.
Even a 486 shouldn't be that slow.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 08:17 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, UK
Distribution: Zenwalk
Posts: 288
Rep:
|
I installed VL on P200 with 32Mb RAM. Used XFCE and worked OK. Not gonna set the world on fire, but ok.
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 07:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: RedHat (RHEL, FC, CentOS), openSuSE, Mac OS X
Posts: 652
Rep:
|
well, fair enough, like i said IceWM might do it
But when i say "it ain't gonna do GUI" i don't mean it's not going to display it, i mean it's not going to be a breeze to use, like i said also, I've run Linux on a 166, and it worked great, but that was quite some time ago.
KDE 2 will do it, and Gnome 1 should also.
In addition Megamieuwsel is quite right (again  ) Disabling non needed Deamons like ftp sendmail whatever could increse your performance ... maybe not dramatically, but definitely increase it.
Sorry, i did express myself poorly
|
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 06:49 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245
Original Poster
Rep:
|
yeah I guess Ill have to reinstall although that is the M$ way of doing thing that Im trying to get away from
|
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 05:27 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
Hmmm....
before you go wiping it all , check the output of "dmesg" , /var/log/messages , /var/log/debug and others that might give a clue.
There's an awfull lot of info in these logs.
(It's an awfull lot of reading too , btw.....)
|
|
|
|
05-19-2004, 12:22 PM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245
Original Poster
Rep:
|
fixed w/o reinstall it was using vesa driver..further editing of xf86....seemed to do it
|
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 03:12 AM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: RedHat (RHEL, FC, CentOS), openSuSE, Mac OS X
Posts: 652
Rep:
|
yeah that'd do it. ... but didn't you say you'd checked that?
well good that it's all working either way
|
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 06:42 AM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245
Original Poster
Rep:
|
sort of ...what I did was get it to work using vesa because on install it didnt detect anything for sh*t and I manually added things to config x until I got a gui.. I had tried using the s3 driver but for some reason it didnt work then once I had the vesa driver I was able to switch to the s3 driver .. it was a cirular process no doubt
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|