LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > VectorLinux
User Name
Password
VectorLinux This forum is for the discussion of VectorLinux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2004, 04:11 PM   #1
wrat
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
curious problem


Ive got a presario 4770 that i scavenged its a p200 with 48 meg ram, some sort of s3trio onboard graphics, 4gig hd etc...Im locked out of the bios I tried adding more mem but itsa no go..... my question I installed vector 3.2 had a hell of time configuring x even tried copying the exact config I got from running damn small linux and no go...got it all running and its DOG slow almost unusable...now dsl running from the cd was fine..the machine is not on my net so I cant post config info....what should I check?? I dont think it is a lost cause , cause dsl from cd ran well...ideas??
 
Old 05-17-2004, 12:54 AM   #2
chakkerz
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: RedHat (RHEL, FC, CentOS), openSuSE, Mac OS X
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 32
define dog slow ... it's a p200 with jack all ram, running a GUI is going to be slow, especially KDE or Gnome.

Try IceWM if you must have a GUI, but i'd be inclined to say that a 200 ain't gonna do GUI. Maybe if you went for something old like SuSE 6.2 or RedHat 7.0 .... but anything recent is going to want something fast. Especially current GUI's

I had a 166 6.2 SuSE Pro ran fine, RedHat 7.0 was ok. 7.1 was bearable. 7.2 leaning towards painful, and after that i gave up. I did try debian 3.0r0 on it and that was torture, as was Slackware 9.0 ...
 
Old 05-17-2004, 06:35 AM   #3
Megamieuwsel
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 35
Quote:
but i'd be inclined to say that a 200 ain't gonna do GUI.
I call BULLOCKS!
There's plenty of lightweight WMs , that'll run ok on a system like that.
IceWM and Fluxbox will be a relief after having tried KDE or Gnome.
If only for the lack of bloat....
What's more effective , is go through the list of servers , started automatically and disabling the ones you don't use anyway.
Replacing XFree with Xorg , will help some as well.
And re-compile the kernel for your architecture : Compiled for i586 works much better on such a system than the default i386.
These are just a few tips.
Use at your leisure.(and risk , maybe....)
 
Old 05-17-2004, 07:45 AM   #4
wrat
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
dog slow is 30-30 seconds for a window to open...I wasnt running kde or gnome I wouldnt expect to be able to...however I know this machine can run dare I say fast because with dsl from the cd it was....now you might say well just load dsl to the hd,however thats not what I wish to do...vector has speed I just need to know how to get it there...
 
Old 05-17-2004, 08:03 AM   #5
Megamieuwsel
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 35
That's not a matter of tweaking ; That's a case of "Something Gone Awfully Wrong Somewhere"(tm)
I had Vector4.0 once running on a P120 laptop with 32MB of RAM and while not exactly a speed-demon , it still wasn't even remotely as slow as that.(didn't get pcmcia working , though...)

I'd advice : Do a clean re-install and monitor every step carefully. Keep pen & paper handy.(in case you get an error-message)
You might also try another formatting. I always use ext-3 and I'm pretty content with that.

Even a 486 shouldn't be that slow.
 
Old 05-17-2004, 09:17 AM   #6
Chris H
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Farnborough, UK
Distribution: Zenwalk
Posts: 288

Rep: Reputation: 30
I installed VL on P200 with 32Mb RAM. Used XFCE and worked OK. Not gonna set the world on fire, but ok.
 
Old 05-17-2004, 08:53 PM   #7
chakkerz
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: RedHat (RHEL, FC, CentOS), openSuSE, Mac OS X
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 32
well, fair enough, like i said IceWM might do it

But when i say "it ain't gonna do GUI" i don't mean it's not going to display it, i mean it's not going to be a breeze to use, like i said also, I've run Linux on a 166, and it worked great, but that was quite some time ago.

KDE 2 will do it, and Gnome 1 should also.

In addition Megamieuwsel is quite right (again ) Disabling non needed Deamons like ftp sendmail whatever could increse your performance ... maybe not dramatically, but definitely increase it.


Sorry, i did express myself poorly
 
Old 05-18-2004, 07:49 AM   #8
wrat
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
yeah I guess Ill have to reinstall although that is the M$ way of doing thing that Im trying to get away from
 
Old 05-18-2004, 06:27 PM   #9
Megamieuwsel
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 35
Hmmm....
before you go wiping it all , check the output of "dmesg" , /var/log/messages , /var/log/debug and others that might give a clue.
There's an awfull lot of info in these logs.
(It's an awfull lot of reading too , btw.....)
 
Old 05-19-2004, 01:22 PM   #10
wrat
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
fixed w/o reinstall it was using vesa driver..further editing of xf86....seemed to do it
 
Old 05-20-2004, 04:12 AM   #11
chakkerz
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: RedHat (RHEL, FC, CentOS), openSuSE, Mac OS X
Posts: 653

Rep: Reputation: 32
yeah that'd do it. ... but didn't you say you'd checked that?

well good that it's all working either way
 
Old 05-20-2004, 07:42 AM   #12
wrat
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 245

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
sort of ...what I did was get it to work using vesa because on install it didnt detect anything for sh*t and I manually added things to config x until I got a gui.. I had tried using the s3 driver but for some reason it didnt work then once I had the vesa driver I was able to switch to the s3 driver .. it was a cirular process no doubt
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A curious problem with driver transplant hzrenjer Linux - Hardware 1 06-27-2005 10:57 PM
Curious k3b problem after upgrade to FC3 ShamitSoneji Fedora 1 12-03-2004 12:55 AM
Curious problem with ffmpeg EwanG Linux - Software 0 05-07-2004 09:30 AM
Curious problem.... Ra_ Slackware 2 06-02-2003 10:44 AM
Lilo - Writing to MBR - Curious Problem streamalot Linux - General 8 04-07-2002 10:43 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration